Finding x in FeC2O4.xH2O: Solving for Unknown Hydrate Composition

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhuthwaite
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the value of x in FeC2O4.xH2O, start by determining the moles of oxalate ions (C2O4^2-) from the titration results, which indicate 1.4575 x 10^-3 moles. This quantity corresponds to the dissociated iron ions in solution, allowing for the calculation of the total mass of iron present. Subtract this mass from the initial mass of the hydrated compound (1.75g) to find the mass of water in the hydrate. Finally, divide the mass of water by the molecular mass of water to solve for x. This method effectively determines the unknown hydrate composition.
rhuthwaite
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
How do I find x in FeC2O4.xH2O. I am told that this is a hydrated salt of 1.75g and was dissolved in acid and made up to 250ml. A 25mL sample of this solution required 29.15mL of standardised 0.0200mol/L KMnO4 solution for complete oxidation.

I worked out n(MnO4-) = cv = 5.83 x 10^-4 moles
and n(C2O4^2-) = 1.4575 x 10^-3 moles
and c(C2O4^2-) = n/v = 0.0583 molL-1
I just don't know how to find x
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well your titration gives you the quantity of Fe Ions in solution (the dissociated Iron). You can take that concentration and find the total mass in the solution, and subtracting that mass from the Hydrous compund mass you can find the mass of H2O present in the hydrated salt. Then you need to divide that mass by the molecular mass of water to find your x.

Hope that's clear...
 
Last edited:
Thanks for helping
I still don't really understand. I am not very good with chemistry
 
Ok. You have done all the hard work, you just need to make the last step. You take a fixed mass of the salt (Hydrated) and disolve it in the acid solution.

V\ =\ 250ml \ =\ 0.25dm^{3}

m\ =\ 1.75g\ = \ 1+\frac{3}{4}=\frac{7}{4}g0.25dm^{3} is \frac{1}{4}dm^{3}

Thefore your concentration is simply:[FeC_{2}O_{4}.xH_{2}O]\ = \ 7g\ dm^{3}You take 25ml\ = 25\times10^{-3}\ dm^{3} = 0.025dm^{3}

And titrate it with Potasium Permanganate KMnO_{4}, For which the half-reaction is:

MnO_{4}^{-}_{(aq)}\ + \ 8H^{+}_{(aq)} \ + \ 5e^{-} \ \rightarrow \ Mn^{2+}_{(aq)} \ + \ 4H_{2}O_{(l)}

The indicator changes color as it goes from Mn(VII) to Mn(II) and Fe is oxidised from Fe(II) to Fe(II).

Fe^{3+}_{(aq)}\ \rightarrow \ Fe^{3+}_{(aq)}\ +\ e^{-}

If you balence the half reactions you get a 5:1 ratio of KMnO_{4}:FeC_{2}O_{4}

This means the quantiy of [Fe^{2+}_{(aq)}] is 5 times the amount of titrant used.
 
Last edited:
Blah, see the other post on titration...this post was taking forever to latex...
 
Thanks heaps!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
23K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top