Finite element analysis node displacement

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of polynomial equations to estimate the center of element displacement in finite element analysis (FEA). Polynomial functions are preferred because they provide a smooth and continuous approximation of displacement based on node values, aligning with the principles of the Galerkin method. Higher-order polynomials allow for more accurate interpolation as the number of nodes increases. Other functions, like logarithmic or exponential, are less commonly used due to their potential for discontinuities and less effective representation of physical behavior in this context. The choice of polynomial functions ultimately results in better real-world accuracy in displacement estimations.
mertcan
Messages
343
Reaction score
6
upload_2017-12-15_10-16-38.png


Hi, I would like to ask why center of element displacement is always estimated with polynomial equation involving nodes displacement (like in attachment/picture)? Also I know that if nodes' number increase for an element then displacement of center of element is estimated with higher order polynomial, why do we always include polynomial equation to estimate center of element?? why don't we use logarithmic or exponential function or other kind of function to model the displacement of center of element?? Does the application of polynomial equation to estimate the displacement of center of element give better real results ?? if it gives then why ??
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-15_10-16-38.png
    upload_2017-12-15_10-16-38.png
    20.2 KB · Views: 2,069
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi everyone I have been waiting for 2 days but nobody has responded to my question is there a in comprehensible situation in thread?
 
My FEA is a bit rusty so maybe others will have to chime into confirm or deny what I'm saying, but I'm replying for the sake of starting the discussion.

In classical finite element theory (really the Galerkin method), we discretize the geometry by placing nodes and connecting them with elements. We are calculating the displacement of the nodes under certain boundary conditions and elements are there to restrict the nodes to be displaced consistent with physical experiment. In the end, the only result we get back are the displacement at the nodes. We have to interpolate to get the displacement at what we're calling the center of the element. In your above image, this just looks like a formulation of a point in barycentric coordinates. I think the exact formulation for interpolation needs to be consistent with the basis functions used for the FEA calculation.

(Note for FEA gurus: this is a really simplistic explanation and not intended to be thorough, so be gentle when ripping this apart :-) )
 
thanks for return @timthereaper , but whenever I want to learn how the center of element displacement is estimated what I see is always it is estimated involving polynomial functions not other functions, so I am really eager to know why only polynomial function is used?
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?
Back
Top