Finite Well and Schrodinger's Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of finding an electron in the left half of a finite potential well using Schrödinger's equation. The wavefunction is symmetric, and the electron's energy is given as 29.66 eV, with a well depth of 50 eV. Participants are trying to determine the correct value for the decay constant k, which is essential for finding the probability density. There is a discrepancy in the calculated value of k, with one participant suggesting that the other may have misapplied the constants involved, particularly the Planck constant. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in equations and proper use of constants in quantum mechanics calculations.
yayz0rs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron is trapped in a finite well of width 0.5 nm and depth of 50 eV. The wavefunction is symmetric about the center of the well (x = 0.25 nm). If the electron has energy 29.66 eV and ψ(0) = 1.42 (nm)-1/2, then what is the probability for finding the particle in the left half of the well (0 < x < 0.25 nm)?


Homework Equations


Schrodinger's Equation in the classically forbidden zone: C1ekx + C2e-kx

The Attempt at a Solution


My idea was that because the probability density from negative infinity to .25 nm (L/2) would be .5, I could simply find p(<0) by integrating Schrodinger's equation and subtracting that from .5. However I cannot find K.

I know the equation for K is \sqrt{2m/(h/2\Pi)^2(U-E)} and it seems like I've been given those 4 variables. However my homework will not accept my answer for K. For reference I've been getting k = 9.25 nm^-1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello yayz0rs,

Welcome to Physics Forums.

I'm getting a different answer for k.

My solution to Shrodinger's equation in that region matches yours (at least involving k). There's nothing wrong with your equation for k, as far as I can tell. But still I'm getting a different value than yours when calculating the number.

For your reference, your value for k is different from mine by close to a factor of \sqrt{2 \pi}. Are you sure you are squaring the 2\pi along with the h? Are you making sure to use the correct value for h (as opposed to \hbar which as the 2 \pi already factored in)?
 
By the way, your equation, as it is written, could use a little clarity by adding parenthesis or something appropriately. In my last post, above, I assume your equation really means

k = \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\hbar^2}(U-E)}

where

\hbar = \frac{h}{2\pi}

in which case, we both got the same equation for k.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top