First detection of direct collapse black holes?

AI Thread Summary
The paper discusses the potential detection of a direct collapse black hole, which could provide insights into the origins of supermassive black holes (SMBH) and galaxies in the early universe. It suggests that in the dense conditions of the universe at redshift z ~ 20, massive gas clouds might collapse directly into black holes without forming stars first. This concept of direct collapse black holes is novel and intriguing, prompting interest in further observations and confirmations. The scientific community is encouraged to monitor citations and discussions surrounding this paper for additional validation. The implications of this research could significantly enhance understanding of cosmic evolution.
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
11,420
Reaction score
751
This paper;http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.01733, Detecting Direct Collapse Black Holes: making the case for CR7, announce potential detection of a direct collapse black hole. Such a detection would shed light on questions such as the origins of SMBH and galaxies in the early universe.
 
  • Like
Likes praveena, jedishrfu, marcus and 1 other person
Space news on Phys.org
Have to say the idea of direct collapse BH is new to me, and sounds very interesting. somehow way back in denser times (they say z ~ 20) clouds of gas could be so massive and dense that they might occasionally collapse directly to BH without first going thru the lifetime of a star. Fascinating. Let's see if the observations are confirmed. Check back later to see if other astronomers cite this paper, and what they say.
 
  • Like
Likes praveena
Agreed. That's the point of ? at the end of the OP topic.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top