First manned mission to another planet

  • Thread starter Alltimegreat1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Planet
In summary, the conversation discusses the potential of a mission to Mercury as an alternative to Mars, due to its similar distance from Earth and potential for water ice in the high northern latitudes. However, the challenges of radiation, lack of atmosphere, and extreme temperatures on Mercury make it a less feasible option compared to Mars. Additionally, the Sun's gravity makes it more difficult to enter an orbit around Mercury, requiring a significant amount of energy. The discussion also touches on the possibility of using the Sun's gravity to aid in the journey, but ultimately concludes that it would still require a significant amount of energy to reach Mercury and safely land.
  • #1
Alltimegreat1
115
5
Everyone talks about Mars as if it's the only logical choice. What about Mercury? It's about the same distance from Earth as Mars and the timing of the return trip back to Earth would more flexible. I read the high northern latitudes of Mercury have moderate temperatures and are near water ice. Why is a mission to Mercury never discussed?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
Alltimegreat1 said:
Everyone talks about Mars as if it's the only logical choice. What about Mercury? It's about the same distance from Earth as Mars and the timing of the return trip back to Earth would more flexible. I read the high northern latitudes of Mercury have moderate temperatures and are near water ice. Why is a mission to Mercury never discussed?
How do you plan to shield the enormous radiation?
 
  • #3
Mercury has almost no atmosphere at all, which limits the methods available for soft landing on it, and also makes setting up a habitable shelter more difficult.
There is less chance of useable water resources being found close to landing site.
Some ice in small amounts may be present at the poles but Mars has a lot of water ice at the poles and quite likely there could be subsurface water in other parts.
Dangerous solar radiation is way stronger than on Mars, (again with no atmosphere to moderate it.)
Finally it's gravitationally locked to the Sun which has the result that some areas are almost permanantly exposed to Sun and have a ground temperature of around 500C, while other area are almost permanent night with a temperature around -200C, so much of the surface is unsuitable to land on due to that.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Fair enough. I suppose they'd want to land near the Martian equator then because it's less cold there.
 
  • #5
I'd say a site near the equator would be more generally favoured, and especially so if the existence of subsurface water was proven.
 
  • #6
Alltimegreat1 said:
It's about the same distance from Earth as Mars

It's not the distance, it's the energetics. Mercury is moving very fast - your spaceship needs to gain a lot of energy. That's why a flight to Mercury (orbit) takes 7 years.
 
  • #7
Vanadium 50 said:
It's not the distance, it's the energetics. Mercury is moving very fast - your spaceship needs to gain a lot of energy. That's why a flight to Mercury (orbit) takes 7 years.
That's what I've always wondered about: why can't the sun's gravity be used?
 
  • #8
What is the velocity of the sun with respect to the sun?
 
  • #9
Vanadium 50 said:
What is the velocity of the sun with respect to the sun?
Thank you. (Blind side hit.)
 
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
It's not the distance, it's the energetics. Mercury is moving very fast - your spaceship needs to gain a lot of energy. That's why a flight to Mercury (orbit) takes 7 years.

It is necessary to get into Mercury's orbit before attempting to land there?
 
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
That's what I've always wondered about: why can't the sun's gravity be used?

It's because of the Sun's gravity that it harder to get to Mercury than it is to get to Mars. In order to enter an orbit that will intersect with Mars, you need to gain 2.96 km/sec. To intersect with Mercury you have to shed 7.51 km/sec*. With rockets it takes fuel to shed velocity just as much as it does to gain it.

It is necessary to get into Mercury's orbit before attempting to land there?

If you want to land without crashing you have to match velocity with Mercury, which is the equivalent of getting into the same orbit as it is in. And to do that you have shed over 9 km/sec of the speed you would be moving when you reach Mercury by the method above.

* A rocket that just leaves Earth is still traveling around the Sun at the same speed as the Earth, which is ~30 km/sec and is enough to keep the Earth at its present distance. To get closer to the Sun, you have to lose enough of that velocity to allow you to fall in as far as Mercury. If you don't lose enough velocity, the following happens: you start to fall in towards the Sun, as you do so, you gain speed, this extra speed tends to make you whip around the Sun faster and eventually you swing around the Sun and begin to climb back out before you even reach Mercury's orbit. It is one of the little peculiarities of orbital mechanics that it takes more energy to move in towards the Sun from Earth's orbit that it does to move out away from it. It is easier to launch a rocket completely free of the Solar system than it is to hit the Sun with it.
 

1. How far away is the nearest planet that could potentially be reached by a manned mission?

The nearest planet that could potentially be reached by a manned mission is Mars, which is approximately 34 million miles away from Earth at its closest point.

2. What are the biggest challenges of sending humans to another planet?

The biggest challenges of sending humans to another planet include the physical and mental toll of long-term space travel, the development of advanced technology to support human life in a harsh environment, and the high cost of such a mission.

3. How long would it take for a manned mission to reach another planet?

The duration of a manned mission to another planet would depend on the distance between Earth and the chosen planet, as well as the speed of the spacecraft. For example, a mission to Mars could take anywhere from 6-9 months.

4. What are the potential risks for astronauts on a manned mission to another planet?

Potential risks for astronauts on a manned mission to another planet include exposure to radiation, isolation and psychological challenges, technical malfunctions, and physical dangers of landing and exploring a new environment.

5. How would a manned mission to another planet benefit scientific research?

A manned mission to another planet would allow for more extensive and detailed research to be conducted on the planet's surface, as humans are more versatile and adaptable than robots. This could lead to new discoveries and a deeper understanding of the planet's composition, history, and potential for sustaining life.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
7
Views
807
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
985
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
0
Views
741
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top