First reactions to Einstein's theories? (support or refute)

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter smhni
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions Theories
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the initial reactions to Einstein's theories published in 1905, including Special Relativity, the photoelectric effect, and Brownian motion. Participants explore whether these theories were supported or refuted by contemporary scientists and the nature of the debates surrounding them.

Discussion Character

  • Historical
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that scientific giants of the time, such as Lorentz, Fitzgerald, and Poincare, had already developed much of the mathematical framework for Special Relativity, suggesting they would not have disagreed with it fundamentally.
  • It is mentioned that while the Brownian motion paper was not controversial, the photoelectric effect paper sparked significant debate, particularly with Bohr's long-standing arguments regarding quantization.
  • One participant references a film that depicts initial refutation of Einstein's theories in England, attributed to national biases, but later support emerged following practical confirmations of his theories.
  • Another participant asserts that Planck supported Einstein's theories, contrasting the reception of Special Relativity with other theories deemed pseudoscientific, emphasizing that the former was a legitimate scientific theory.
  • There is a discussion about the dissemination of information at the time, noting that acceptance of relativity grew significantly after Eddington's confirmation, leading to increased interest and education on the topic.
  • Some participants clarify that Einstein published multiple papers in 1905, including two parts on relativity and additional works, highlighting the complexity of his contributions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views, with some agreeing on the supportive stance of key scientists like Planck and Eddington, while others highlight the initial controversies and debates surrounding the interpretations of Einstein's work. Overall, the discussion reflects multiple competing views and remains unresolved regarding the extent and nature of the initial reactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the historical context, such as the influence of national biases and the challenges of information dissemination at the time, which may have affected the reception of Einstein's theories.

smhni
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm just curious, what was the first reactions to Einstein's theories (it was 1905, right?) ... were they refuted or supported?

was it like "Oh! these are nonsense..these are pseudoscience .. we shall burn you"?!

or were they garnered respectable amount of debate?... were they supported by scientific giants of that time?.. thanks.P.S: any good links would be appreciated too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smhni said:
or were they garnered respectable amount of debate?... were they supported by scientific giants of that time?..

The scientific giants of the time, such as Lorentz, Fitzgerald and Poincare had already created most of the mathematical framework for Special Relativity, so they would have no reason to disagree with it. They basically differed in the interpretation of what the maths meant and Einstein was credited with having the better interpretation.
 
Last edited:
Einstein published three papers in 1905: relativity, the photoelectric effect, and Brownian motion.

I don't think the Brownian motion paper was controversial.

The photoelectric effect was controversial. Bohr, for example, argued for decades that matter should be quantized, but electromagnetic radiation shouldn't.
 
i saw this movie called "Einstein & Eddington". The movie showed that it was refuted in England due to obvious reasons (Einstein being from Germany). However after practical results of Einstein actually being right and a few years past, Einstein was supported. Eddington was a scientist from England who actually believed Einsteins theories would work.
 
were they supported by scientific giants of that time?
Yes, by Planck.
was it like "Oh! these are nonsense..these are pseudoscience .. we shall burn you"?!
Just in the improbable case that you're going to argue that the PF community would likely have rejected Einstein's theories, just as it now rejects "theory" xy:
Maybe.
But there's a difference between SR and xy: the latter actually is nonsense and pseudoscience, the former is a theory. And one doesn't get burned for it, one gets banned, which is not lethal.
 
Ich said:
Yes, by Planck.

Just in the improbable case that you're going to argue that the PF community would likely have rejected Einstein's theories, just as it now rejects "theory" xy:
Maybe.
But there's a difference between SR and xy: the latter actually is nonsense and pseudoscience, the former is a theory. And one doesn't get burned for it, one gets banned, which is not lethal.

To be fair, we'd do what any sane people would, demand evidence and examine the whole thing. Relativity didn't become a HOUSHOLD word until Eddington returned home. It was at least well accepted enough in England that a young Paul Dirac latched onto it asap.

From 'The Strangest Man', I can say that at the time the pseudoscience was coming primarily from people hocking pamphlets claiming to teach this 'new theory' (not unlike similar ads in SciAm, and every other publication of today). Once that confirmation occurred, it was a stampede to learn from a limited number of capable teachers. OF course, there were people claiming to teach Relativity who misunderstood, decieved, etc... but that happens with any new theory.

Now, unlike then, the information would be all about the world as it was being developed, or at least upon publication. Access to documents of record is so common now, you have to remember that at the time the issue was less about acceptance and more about getting the word around in a meaningful way.
 
bcrowell said:
Einstein published three papers in 1905: relativity, the photoelectric effect, and Brownian motion.

Actually, four, plus his dissertation. Relativity was in two parts: SR and mass-energy equivalence. In 1906 he published a paper on the specific heat of solids, which explained the empirical law of Dulong and Petit.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
18K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
47K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
17K