First Year Physics: Is My Study Plan Effective?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on effective study strategies for a calculus-based physics course. The original poster is concerned about their current study method, which involves writing detailed notes from the textbook, taking a significant amount of time without yet tackling practice problems. Various contributors suggest a more efficient approach, emphasizing the importance of problem-solving over extensive note-taking. Key recommendations include focusing on understanding concepts discussed in lectures, doing practice problems to reinforce learning, and utilizing resources like MIT's open courseware videos. Participants also highlight the value of asking professors for help and seeking study groups. The consensus is that detailed notes may not be necessary for physics, and instead, students should concentrate on areas where they struggle and engage actively with problem sets to enhance their understanding.
Jacobalg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is my first year taking a physics course and i am taking calculus based physics. My study plan so far has been writing detailed notes from the book and each section would take me a good hour. I have not done the practice problems just yet as i have two more sections to finish. Is this wasting time ? if so what method should i use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Make notes for a section.
2. do the problems for that section.
3. Move to next section.
4. Watch MIT's open courseware videos. They are good. Walter Lewin is a champ.
5. Ask questions on the forums for additional help.

Don't forget to ask your professor for help too. And ask around about study groups.IMO, for efficiency, I would focus on topics which are your weakest. If you know how to do vector addition, don't worry about notes and problems for that section. Focus on what you have trouble with.
 
me to

i am doing my undergraduate in physics in a reputed university in India
i don't no what my possibilities are ?
help me to get a internship so that i have more of a professional knowledge
 
Jacobalg said:
This is my first year taking a physics course and i am taking calculus based physics. My study plan so far has been writing detailed notes from the book and each section would take me a good hour. I have not done the practice problems just yet as i have two more sections to finish. Is this wasting time ? if so what method should i use?

I don't really take notes from the textbook. I usually read the chapter before the lecture and take notes of whatever the professor says that wasn't in the textbook. That makes my work much more efficient.
 
IMHO, taking notes for physics is a waste of time. I think taking notes is more appropriate for a biology course where you have to absorb a lot of information. Here, the amount of information is sparse, what's important is your interpretation of that information.

By the way, taking notes can mean lots of things. The type of note-taking I do is copying the mathematical derivations and thinking them through along with the author. That type of note taking I would say is quite nice.

What I would do is try to masticate these ideas in every way possible. Whenever you have a wrong approach to a problem, prove why this approach was incorrect. In my experience, I can't stress enough how important right-interpretation is. Also, do lots of problems.

Good luck.
 
If you have a competent instructor there is no need to take detailed notes from a book. In fact, I would say that would detract from your learning experience. Your notes should consist mostly of what was discussed in lecture. Reading the book comes next but only to reinforce what was taught in lecture (you mostly skim it or read it if it doesn't take too long).

In physics, problems are emphasized more (at least where I attend school) primarily because that is how you will learn the actual physics. Do easy problems, and once you build up your competence (i.e. confidence in understanding) of the easier problems you should tackle the harder problems.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top