Fissionable Elements - Substitute teacher looking for answer

In summary, the conversation discusses the topic of fissionable elements and the minimum A number for these elements, which is suggested to be around 153-156. However, after further discussion and research, it is determined that the actual minimum A number is closer to 232, as seen in Th-232. The conversation also touches on the concept of spallation and the potential for induced fission with masses lower than 80 amu. Further research is suggested to verify the probabilities of induced fission with these lower masses.
  • #1
bearspencer
2
0
Got a question about fissionable (as opposed to fissile) elements.

I vaguely remember the minimum A number for (theoretically) fissionable elements is somewhere in the vicinity of 153 to 156.

But I don't recall the exact figure, neither google nor ask.com have been of help and I'd like to be able to go back to class this afternoon with the answer.

Anyone lend a hand?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's more like 232, as in Th-232, which like U-238, is fissionable with fast neutrons. However Pa-231 apparently has a very small probability of spontaneous fission, but it itself is a decay/spallation product.

Ref: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/ - put cursor over element (Z,N), click on it, and then click Zoom 1.

A=153-156 is in the range of Gd (primarily 155, 157), Dy (161, 163) which are good neutron absorbers.

Lighter elements experience spallation in which a high energy neutron may knock out some nucleons ((n,p), (n,2n), (n,3n)), or an alpha particle.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the reminder on spallation, and you're right, Gd and Dy have pretty decent cross sections.

But the thing is this; I distinctly remember being surprised that nuclei with a mass 80 amu or so below what I was used to seeing could fission and further surprised that the reaction was either endothermic or close to it.

Any thoughts as to how we could further check to verify the probabilities of induced fission with masses this low? I'd hate to think it was only my memory that was decaying.
 
  • #4
One can search here for available reactions
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/ensdf/

There do not appear any fission reactions with A=80.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nucene/nucbin.html#c2
There is a comment that nuclides heavier than iron can release energy by fission, but I believe that in most cases, absorption of neutrons yields gamma emission, or other nucleons, or spallation - but not fission. Nature tends to take the easiest path to emit excess energy.
 
  • #5
bearspencer said:
T
But the thing is this; I distinctly remember being surprised that nuclei with a mass 80 amu or so below
Are you thinking of the Iron minimum, in stars you can form heavier elements by fusion only upto Iron. After that it requires energy to join heavier elements and so presumably energy would be released if they split.
 

What is a fissionable element?

A fissionable element is an atom that is capable of undergoing nuclear fission, a process in which the nucleus of the atom splits into smaller parts, releasing a large amount of energy.

What are some examples of fissionable elements?

Some examples of fissionable elements include uranium-235, plutonium-239, and thorium-232.

Why are fissionable elements important?

Fissionable elements are important because they are the primary source of energy in nuclear reactors and nuclear weapons. They also play a crucial role in nuclear medicine and scientific research.

Can fissionable elements be replaced with other elements?

Yes, fissionable elements can be replaced with other elements in certain nuclear reactions. For example, thorium-232 can be used as a substitute for uranium-235 in some nuclear reactors.

What are some risks associated with fissionable elements?

Fissionable elements can pose significant health and environmental risks if not handled properly. The nuclear fission process can produce radioactive waste, and accidents at nuclear facilities can lead to the release of harmful radiation.

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top