Fluid Dynamics - Rate of Change of Momentum question

Click For Summary
A vertical jet of water with a diameter of 3 cm and a velocity of 4 m/s impacts a horizontal plate, prompting a discussion on calculating the force exerted on the plate. The initial calculations focus on determining the mass flow rate and the change in momentum, with emphasis on the importance of multiplying by velocity to find the momentum flow rate. Participants clarify that the vertical momentum after impact is zero, as the water spreads horizontally. The correct units for force are confirmed to be Newtons, derived from mass flow rate multiplied by velocity. The methodology discussed is validated, though participants are encouraged to ensure their arithmetic is accurate.
Tom Hardy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A vertical jet of water of 3cm in diameter impinges upon a horizontal flat plate with a velocity of 4m/s, and all of the water spreads out horizontally. Find the force exerted on the plate.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not 100% sure how to tackle this, from what I can understand understand it could have something to do with F=dp/dt (p being momentum) but I am not sure how to work out the change in momentum. If we consider an element that is about to hit the plate with dimensions Area = \pi*(1.5*10^{-2})^2 volume = 4*(\pi*(1.5*10^{-2})^2) mass is the same value as volume so momentum would be 16*(\pi*(1.5*10^{-2})^2) That's where I get up to, I mean the water goes sideways so how do I figure out it's momentum after, how does continuity play out here? :S Should I just take it after to be 0?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've calculated so far is the mass flow rate of water against the plate. But this is not the rate of momentum flow against the plate. To get that, you need to multiply by the velocity again. Check the units to be sure that this indeed comes out to force.

You are correct that, since the flow after hitting the plate is zero, that vertical momentum is zero.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What you've calculated so far is the mass flow rate of water against the plate. But this is not the rate of momentum flow against the plate. To get that, you need to multiply by the velocity again. Check the units to be sure that this indeed comes out to force.

You are correct that, since the flow after hitting the plate is zero, that vertical momentum is zero.

Chet

Hi Chet,

Thank you for replying. If I take a look at the units then:

We start with area \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2 which has units m^2, then we times by a velocity 4 to get volumetric flow rate with units \frac{m^3}{s}, then we multiply the volumetric flow rate by the density of water to get a mass flow rate of units \frac{kg^3}{s} so to get a force shouldn't I just multiply that by the velocity again to get \frac{kg^3m}{s}?

So I end up with ( \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2*4*999.7*4 ) \approx 16000\pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2, the answer that I get from that (11.3) is one of the multiple choice answers but I am still not 100% sure if it is correct.

Many thanks for your help!
 
Tom Hardy said:
Hi Chet,

Thank you for replying. If I take a look at the units then:

We start with area \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2 which has units m^2, then we times by a velocity 4 to get volumetric flow rate with units \frac{m^3}{s}, then we multiply the volumetric flow rate by the density of water to get a mass flow rate of units \frac{kg^3}{s} so to get a force shouldn't I just multiply that by the velocity again to get \frac{kg^3m}{s}?

Yes. But that power of 3 on the kg needs to be corrected. It should just be kg. And, when you multiply by the velocity again, you get kg-m/s^2 = Newtons.
So I end up with ( \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2*4*999.7*4 ) \approx 16000\pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2, the answer that I get from that (11.3) is one of the multiple choice answers but I am still not 100% sure if it is correct.

Many thanks for your help!
I haven't checked the arithmetic, but the methodology is correct.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes Tom Hardy
Chestermiller said:
Yes. But that power of 3 on the kg needs to be corrected. It should just be kg. And, when you multiply by the velocity again, you get kg-m/s^2 = Newtons.

I haven't checked the arithmetic, but the methodology is correct.

Chet
Woops,that was a typo, thanks a lot for your help.
 
Tom Hardy said:
Woops,that was a typo, I meant to say meter cubed. Thanks a lot for help.
Actually, you should only have m to the first power in your final answer. The units have to be Newtons = kg-m/s^2.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Actually, you should only have m to the first power in your final answer. The units have to be Newtons = kg-m/s^2.

Chet

Yeah, I edited it straight after I posted it :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K