Fluid Dynamics - Rate of Change of Momentum question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving fluid dynamics, specifically the calculation of the force exerted on a horizontal plate by a vertical jet of water. Participants explore the relationship between mass flow rate, momentum, and force, while addressing unit conversions and the implications of water's behavior upon impact with the plate.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to calculate the change in momentum and questions whether the momentum after impact should be considered zero.
  • Another participant clarifies that the mass flow rate calculated does not equate to the rate of momentum flow and suggests multiplying by velocity to find the force.
  • A participant attempts to verify the units involved in the calculations, noting that the mass flow rate should be multiplied by velocity to yield force, while also correcting a misunderstanding about unit dimensions.
  • There is a discussion about the correct units for mass flow rate and force, with emphasis on ensuring the final answer is expressed in Newtons.
  • Participants acknowledge a typo regarding units and clarify the correct dimensional analysis for the calculations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the methodology for calculating the force but express uncertainty about the correctness of the final numerical answer. There is no consensus on the final value, as participants have not verified the arithmetic involved.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved points regarding the assumptions made about the behavior of water after it impacts the plate and the implications for momentum calculations. The discussion also highlights the importance of unit consistency in fluid dynamics problems.

Tom Hardy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A vertical jet of water of 3cm in diameter impinges upon a horizontal flat plate with a velocity of 4m/s, and all of the water spreads out horizontally. Find the force exerted on the plate.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not 100% sure how to tackle this, from what I can understand understand it could have something to do with F=dp/dt (p being momentum) but I am not sure how to work out the change in momentum. If we consider an element that is about to hit the plate with dimensions Area = \pi*(1.5*10^{-2})^2 volume = 4*(\pi*(1.5*10^{-2})^2) mass is the same value as volume so momentum would be 16*(\pi*(1.5*10^{-2})^2) That's where I get up to, I mean the water goes sideways so how do I figure out it's momentum after, how does continuity play out here? :S Should I just take it after to be 0?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've calculated so far is the mass flow rate of water against the plate. But this is not the rate of momentum flow against the plate. To get that, you need to multiply by the velocity again. Check the units to be sure that this indeed comes out to force.

You are correct that, since the flow after hitting the plate is zero, that vertical momentum is zero.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What you've calculated so far is the mass flow rate of water against the plate. But this is not the rate of momentum flow against the plate. To get that, you need to multiply by the velocity again. Check the units to be sure that this indeed comes out to force.

You are correct that, since the flow after hitting the plate is zero, that vertical momentum is zero.

Chet

Hi Chet,

Thank you for replying. If I take a look at the units then:

We start with area \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2 which has units m^2, then we times by a velocity 4 to get volumetric flow rate with units \frac{m^3}{s}, then we multiply the volumetric flow rate by the density of water to get a mass flow rate of units \frac{kg^3}{s} so to get a force shouldn't I just multiply that by the velocity again to get \frac{kg^3m}{s}?

So I end up with ( \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2*4*999.7*4 ) \approx 16000\pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2, the answer that I get from that (11.3) is one of the multiple choice answers but I am still not 100% sure if it is correct.

Many thanks for your help!
 
Tom Hardy said:
Hi Chet,

Thank you for replying. If I take a look at the units then:

We start with area \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2 which has units m^2, then we times by a velocity 4 to get volumetric flow rate with units \frac{m^3}{s}, then we multiply the volumetric flow rate by the density of water to get a mass flow rate of units \frac{kg^3}{s} so to get a force shouldn't I just multiply that by the velocity again to get \frac{kg^3m}{s}?

Yes. But that power of 3 on the kg needs to be corrected. It should just be kg. And, when you multiply by the velocity again, you get kg-m/s^2 = Newtons.
So I end up with ( \pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2*4*999.7*4 ) \approx 16000\pi(1.5*10^{-2})^2, the answer that I get from that (11.3) is one of the multiple choice answers but I am still not 100% sure if it is correct.

Many thanks for your help!
I haven't checked the arithmetic, but the methodology is correct.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom Hardy
Chestermiller said:
Yes. But that power of 3 on the kg needs to be corrected. It should just be kg. And, when you multiply by the velocity again, you get kg-m/s^2 = Newtons.

I haven't checked the arithmetic, but the methodology is correct.

Chet
Woops,that was a typo, thanks a lot for your help.
 
Tom Hardy said:
Woops,that was a typo, I meant to say meter cubed. Thanks a lot for help.
Actually, you should only have m to the first power in your final answer. The units have to be Newtons = kg-m/s^2.

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
Actually, you should only have m to the first power in your final answer. The units have to be Newtons = kg-m/s^2.

Chet

Yeah, I edited it straight after I posted it :P
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K