Fluid mechanics help, where am i going wrong?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted on a wall due to fluid pressure, where the user struggles with missing dimensions, specifically depth. It is suggested to assume a depth of 1 meter to simplify calculations, allowing for the determination of force using pressure and effective height. The user is reminded that the force should be calculated in Newtons, not kg/s², by multiplying pressure by the effective height and depth. Additionally, the conversation touches on the process of finding the tipping point and maximum friction force by summing torques about a specific point. Overall, the guidance emphasizes simplifying assumptions and correct unit conversions for fluid mechanics problems.
shadow7874
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6918/screenshot20110828at111.png

Homework Equations


P_base= rho * h * g = 1800 kg/m^3 * h * 9.81 m/s^2 = 17658 * h kg/(m^2 s^2)
F_h= .5 * h * P_base = 10594.8 * h^2 kg/(m^2 s^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to find the force F_h by calculating the pressure at the bottom of the load and creating a resultant. The issue i believe i am having is that there is no depth given so I'm not sure how to calculate the force on a wall since i only have 1 of the walls dimension. Unless I'm reading the problem incorrectly and the width and depth are both .25m? When i do the math the F_h works out to be kg/s^2 instead of Newtons.

Once i figure out the F_h i would then just need to take the moment about A to find the tipping point and the max F_friction to find the highest sliding point, correct? If anyone could guide me as to what I'm doing wrong that would be helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you're on the right track.

When a dimension is omitted in a problem you can be pretty sure it's not needed. Just assume a 1m depth. Then compute the resultant for F_H to get the slip point and sum torques (moments) about A as you say.

Isn't it funny how they say "retaining wall" instead of just "dam"?

PS - force is now pressure * effective height * 1m, you realize.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K