Fluid question: Detecting Blood Pressure in Mice

AI Thread Summary
Detecting blood pressure in mice can yield lower readings than expected due to potential issues with the setup. The diameter of the pipe and the sharpness of its tip may influence pressure readings, but other factors must also be considered. Calibration of the blood pressure detector and control conditions are crucial for accurate measurements. Viscous losses in the system could contribute to lower readings. Further investigation into these variables is necessary to diagnose the problem effectively.
magic_castle32
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Need some help regarding fluid flow and pressure detection:To detect blood pressure in a mouse, we usually insert a small pipe with a refined tip into the artery that is connected to a blood pressure detector. However, the problem we have been getting is that the detected blood pressure is lower than it actually should be.

Why is this the case?

Would changing the pipe diameter, or 'pointiness' of the tip, be of help in getting a more accurate reading?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without more information, it's hard to diagnose the problem:

How is the detector calibrated? What is your control condition? How do you know the readings are incorrect?

For example, do you also take a reading in the tail vein?
 
Andy Resnick said:
Without more information, it's hard to diagnose the problem:

How is the detector calibrated? What is your control condition? How do you know the readings are incorrect?

For example, do you also take a reading in the tail vein?
The experimental setup is properly calibrated.

I just want to know if the pipe diameter, or the 'pointiness' of the tip of the pipe, could influence the pressure. Otherwise we'd have to look into other variables, or other aspects of the set-up.
 
It's easy to imagine viscous losses which would give low pressure readings. But again, without any information about your setup, it's hard to say anything definitive.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top