Fluid question: Detecting Blood Pressure in Mice

AI Thread Summary
Detecting blood pressure in mice can yield lower readings than expected due to potential issues with the setup. The diameter of the pipe and the sharpness of its tip may influence pressure readings, but other factors must also be considered. Calibration of the blood pressure detector and control conditions are crucial for accurate measurements. Viscous losses in the system could contribute to lower readings. Further investigation into these variables is necessary to diagnose the problem effectively.
magic_castle32
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Need some help regarding fluid flow and pressure detection:To detect blood pressure in a mouse, we usually insert a small pipe with a refined tip into the artery that is connected to a blood pressure detector. However, the problem we have been getting is that the detected blood pressure is lower than it actually should be.

Why is this the case?

Would changing the pipe diameter, or 'pointiness' of the tip, be of help in getting a more accurate reading?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without more information, it's hard to diagnose the problem:

How is the detector calibrated? What is your control condition? How do you know the readings are incorrect?

For example, do you also take a reading in the tail vein?
 
Andy Resnick said:
Without more information, it's hard to diagnose the problem:

How is the detector calibrated? What is your control condition? How do you know the readings are incorrect?

For example, do you also take a reading in the tail vein?
The experimental setup is properly calibrated.

I just want to know if the pipe diameter, or the 'pointiness' of the tip of the pipe, could influence the pressure. Otherwise we'd have to look into other variables, or other aspects of the set-up.
 
It's easy to imagine viscous losses which would give low pressure readings. But again, without any information about your setup, it's hard to say anything definitive.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top