Fluid velocity and pipe diameter using the continuity equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a fluid dynamics problem involving the continuity equation and the relationship between fluid velocity and pipe diameter. Participants are examining the implications of given values such as pipe diameter and fluid velocity, and questioning the consistency of the problem statement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the mass flow rate calculation based on the provided diameter and velocity, with some suggesting that the problem statement may be poorly worded or inconsistent. Others are exploring different interpretations of the fluid's velocity before entering the pipe and the implications for calculating exit velocity and diameter.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem's wording and the assumptions that can be made regarding fluid pressure and density. Some participants have offered insights into the continuity equation and its application, while others express concern over the clarity of the problem statement.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding pressure in the problem statement, which complicates the use of the Bernoulli equation. The discussion also references that this question is part of a multipart problem, suggesting that additional context may be necessary for full understanding.

Bolter
Messages
262
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
See below
Relevant Equations
continuity equation
Hi,
Can anyone let me know if I had done this Q correctly?

Screenshot 2020-10-20 at 17.22.20.png


IMG_5388.JPG


Thanks for any help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, something about this problem statement seems wrong. If the pipe opening is of diameter ##d_1 = \mathrm{40mm}## and the fluid enters at ##v_1 = \mathrm{0.5ms^{-1}}##, then the mass flow rate should be $$\dot{m} = A_1 \rho v_1 = \frac{\pi}{4} {d_1}^2 \rho v_1 \approx \mathrm{0.64 kg s^{-1}}$$and not ##\mathrm{5 kg s^{-1}}## like they're saying.

You're right to say that if the kinetic energy density halves, then the speed is reduced by a factor of ##\sqrt{2}##, but apart from that the actual question seems inconsistent to me.
 
etotheipi said:
Hmm, something about this problem statement seems wrong. If the pipe opening is of diameter ##d_1 = \mathrm{40mm}## and the fluid enters at ##v_1 = \mathrm{0.5ms^{-1}}##, then the mass flow rate should be $$\dot{m} = A_1 \rho v_1 = \frac{\pi}{4} {d_1}^2 \rho v_1 \approx \mathrm{0.64 kg s^{-1}}$$and not ##\mathrm{5 kg s^{-1}}## like they're saying.

You're right to say that if the kinetic energy density halves, then the speed is reduced by a factor of ##\sqrt{2}##, but apart from that the actual question seems inconsistent to me.
I agree with your numbers but I am disturbed by this problem and I am looking for other ways to interpret what is given and what is being asked. One must take the flow rate and fluid density at face value. I know it's a stretch but one might interpret "enters a horizontal pipe of diameter 40 mm with a velocity of 0.5 m/s" to mean that the fluid has velocity 0.5 m/s before it enters the 40 mm pipe. One then would have to calculate the fluid velocity inside the pipe (your calculation) and use that to find the exit fluid velocity and diameter. Also, there is no mention of pressure in the statement. If one is to use the Bernoulli equation additional assumptions need to be made, e.g. the pressure in the fluid before it enters the 40 mm dia. pipe is atmospheric or some such thing. I don't think this is a well written problem unless there is more to this that we don't know. Note that this is part (e) of a multipart problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
@kuruman I think this is just a case of a very poorly worded question about the continuity equation for incompressible flow ##\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -\nabla \cdot \rho\vec{v}##. There will be a pressure change, but I don't think this is important for this question. If we take a surface that coincides with the pipe and its two faces, then $$\frac{dm}{dt} = -\int_{\partial \Omega} \rho \vec{v} \cdot d\vec{S} = 0$$and by extension, since no fluid crosses the pipe walls, then$$\frac{dm}{dt} = -\rho\vec{v}_{\text{in}} \cdot \vec{S}_{\text{inlet}} - \rho \vec{v}_{\text{out}} \cdot \vec{S}_{outlet} = 0$$in the simple case where ##\vec{S}_{\text{inlet}}## and ##\vec{S}_{\text{outlet}}## are parallel, and the flow uniform across a cross section of the fluid, this is more simply described as$$\rho v_{\text{in}} S_{\text{inlet}} = \rho v_{\text{out}} S_{\text{outlet}}$$i.e. we're simply constraining the net flow of mass into the system to be zero.

...but I think the problem-setter has botched the numbers :doh:
 
kuruman said:
I agree with your numbers but I am disturbed by this problem and I am looking for other ways to interpret what is given and what is being asked. One must take the flow rate and fluid density at face value. I know it's a stretch but one might interpret "enters a horizontal pipe of diameter 40 mm with a velocity of 0.5 m/s" to mean that the fluid has velocity 0.5 m/s before it enters the 40 mm pipe. One then would have to calculate the fluid velocity inside the pipe (your calculation) and use that to find the exit fluid velocity and diameter. Also, there is no mention of pressure in the statement. If one is to use the Bernoulli equation additional assumptions need to be made, e.g. the pressure in the fluid before it enters the 40 mm dia. pipe is atmospheric or some such thing. I don't think this is a well written problem unless there is more to this that we don't know. Note that this is part (e) of a multipart problem.
I mistakenly believed that the pressure would be equal to the water's actual pressure, which is 1000 kg/m3, or?
 
Kelvin Perry said:
I mistakenly believed that the pressure would be equal to the water's actual pressure, which is 1000 kg/m3, or?
You also mistakenly believe that the units of pressure are kg/m3. Anyway, this thread is about a year and a half old. Or what?
 
"At the exit of the pipe, the fluid kinetic energy has halved."
compared with when? Before entering the pipe or just after?
 
kuruman said:
You also mistakenly believe that the units of pressure are kg/m3. Anyway, this thread is about a year and a half old. Or what?
I think he is mistaking pressure for density …
 
etotheipi said:
...but I think the problem-setter has botched the numbers :doh:
Yes, this: it looks like the last sentence was added in error.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K