Flux integral of a curl = zero

Click For Summary
Stokes's theorem confirms that the flux integral of a curl of a vector field over a closed surface is indeed zero, as there is no boundary curve to contribute to the line integral. This is supported by the divergence theorem, which states that the integral of the curl's divergence over a volume is zero, given the necessary continuity conditions. The divergence of a curl is always zero, reinforcing the conclusion that the flux integral over a closed surface vanishes. This relationship can also be understood through physical concepts, such as the conservation of circulation in fluid dynamics. Thus, the integral of a curl over a closed surface is consistently zero.
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Does Stokes's theorem imply that the flux integral of a curl of a vector field over a closed surface is always zero? (because then there is no boundary curve and thus the line integral over the boundary curve is zero)

Is there an insightful way to see why this is always true? Maybe a connection with physics or so.

Thank you,
mr vodka
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By the divergence theorem

\int\int_S \nabla \times \vec F\cdot \hat n\, dS = \int\int\int_V \nabla \cdot \nabla \times \vec F\, dV= 0

because under appropriate continuity conditions the divergence of a curl is zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K