Does Stokes's theorem imply that the flux integral of a curl of a vector field over a closed surface is always zero? (because then there is no boundary curve and thus the line integral over the boundary curve is zero)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is there an insightful way to see why this is always true? Maybe a connection with physics or so.

Thank you,

mr vodka

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Flux integral of a curl = zero

Loading...

Similar Threads - Flux integral curl | Date |
---|---|

Questions on conditions for calculating flux integrals? | Dec 1, 2013 |

Surface Integral, flux. Boundary and orientation | Mar 10, 2012 |

Flux integrals and modeling surfaces with MAPLE 13 | Oct 17, 2011 |

Flux Integrals | Dec 5, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**