Solving a Complex Flux Integral Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving a complex flux integral problem using parameterization and vector calculus. The user parameterized the surface as \( r(t,s) = [s, s^2 + t^2, t] \) and calculated the cross product of the partial derivatives. Initial integration yielded an incorrect answer of \( \frac{35}{384} \). After guidance, the user corrected the limits of integration to polar coordinates, resulting in the correct answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and flux integrals
  • Familiarity with parameterization of surfaces
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and cross products
  • Ability to convert Cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about parameterizing surfaces in vector calculus
  • Study the process of calculating flux integrals
  • Explore the conversion of integrals from Cartesian to polar coordinates
  • Investigate common mistakes in setting limits of integration for surface integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus and surface integrals, as well as educators seeking to understand common pitfalls in teaching these concepts.

tomizzo
Messages
113
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



flux.png


Homework Equations



I know that flux is ∫∫F[r(t,s)]dotted[∂r/∂s x ∂r/∂t]dtds

The Attempt at a Solution



So I parameterized the equation y=x^2+z^2

as:

x = s
y = s^2 + t^2
z = t
r(t,s) = [s, s^2+t^2, t]
I take the partial derivative of r with respect to s and t and then take the cross product.

I then that F[r(s,t)] and dot that with the cross product above.

I then need the boundaries which I find to be 1/sqrt(2) ≤ s ≤ 1/sqrt(8) and 1/sqrt(2) ≤ s ≤ 1/sqrt(8)

After integrating I get the answer 35/384 which says it's incorrect. I did the problem all over again and got the same exact answer. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you checked whether ##r_s\times r_t## is in the direction consistent with the given orientation of the surface? Also, just curious, why you rename the variables instead of just using ##x## and ##z## as the parameters.
 
Doing this problem in the same way you describe, I get (21/16)\pi rather than your answer. You will need to describe more exactly what you did. What did you get for d\vec{S}? What limits of integration did you use?
 
LCKurtz, my rs×rt does point in the direction I believe it is supposed to. Also, the reason I renamed the variables was just my preference I guess. When setting up the vector, I like to think of each component that acts like the x, y, and z. It's probably unnecessary but that what I did.

Let me give more detail into my work.

- So I parameterized the equation y=x^2+z^2

x = s
y = s^2 + t^2
z = t

- I then get r(t,s) = [s, s^2 + t^2, t]

- I then take the partial derivative with respect to both variables
∂r/∂s = [1, 2s, 0] and ∂r/∂t = [0, 2t, 1]

- I then take the cross product of these to get,

[2s, -1, 2t]

- Now this cross product is oriented away from the y-axis at all times, unless t and s are 0 I suppose...

- I then use this formula ∫∫F[r(t,s)]dotted[∂r/∂s x ∂r/∂t]dtds

- ∫∫ [s+t, 1, t]dotted[2s,-1,2t]dtds

-Which equals

∫∫(2t^2+2ts+2s^2-1)dtds

-I use the limits of 1/sqrt(2) ≤ s ≤ 1/sqrt(8) and 1/sqrt(2) ≤ s ≤ 1/sqrt(8) because these translate to match up with my parametrized equations and the limitation that 1/4 ≤ y≤ 1
 
Ignore that post I just did if you saw it. Be back later.
 
tomizzo said:
∫∫(2t^2+2ts+2s^2-1)dtds

-I use the limits of 1/sqrt(2) ≤ s ≤ 1/sqrt(8) and 1/sqrt(2) ≤ s ≤ 1/sqrt(8) because these translate to match up with my parametrized equations and the limitation that 1/4 ≤ y≤ 1

You are OK to there. But those limits describe a square. You need to change the integral to polar coordinates. Your t and s parameters should describe the region between two circles in the st (same as xz) plane.
 
In doing that,

would the ∫∫(2t^2+2ts+2s^2-1)dtds turn into ∫∫((2r^2+2*r*sin(θ)*r*cos(θ)-1)*r)drdθ with boundaries of 1/4≤ r ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2pi ?
 
tomizzo said:
In doing that,

would the ∫∫(2t^2+2ts+2s^2-1)dtds turn into ∫∫((2r^2+2*r*sin(θ)*r*cos(θ)-1)*r)drdθ with boundaries of 1/4≤ r ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2pi ?

Those are the limits for ##r^2##, not ##r##.
 
LCKurtz said:
Those are the limits for ##r^2##, not ##r##.

Ahh, yes I almost messed that on up big time. So it should be 1/2 ≤ r ≤ 1
 
  • #10
Thanks so much LCKurtz, that seemed to be what I was doing wrong and I got the correct answer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K