Football Players: Solve Sliding Distance After Collision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nightrider55
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between two football players, Fred and Brutus, where the goal is to determine the sliding distance after they collide and fall to the ground. The context includes concepts from momentum conservation and kinematics, with a focus on the effects of friction on their sliding distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of conservation of momentum to find the velocity after the collision and the subsequent calculations for acceleration and distance. There are questions about the correctness of the computed values and the potential for errors in the computer system used for submission.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the calculations and expressing concerns about discrepancies between their results and the expected answer. Some have suggested that the issue may lie with the computer system rather than their methodology, and there is acknowledgment of similar past experiences with such systems.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific requirements for the answer format (in centimeters) and the possibility of errors in the computer's answer-checking system. Participants are also considering the implications of their findings and the need for further clarification from instructors or tech support.

Nightrider55
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Fred (mass 60.0kg) is running with the football at a speed of 6.0m/s when he is met head-on by Brutus (mass 120kg), who is moving at 4.0m/s. Brutus grabs Fred in a tight grip, and they fall to the ground. How far do they slide?
Part A
The coefficient of kinetic friction between football uniforms and Astroturf is 0.3.
Give answer in cm


Homework Equations



MfVf + MbVb=(Mf+Mb)Vs
Kinematics

Ax=-mew x g



The Attempt at a Solution



I did the problem and doubled check my work and even had a friend check it and we couldn't find a mistake but I still get it wrong

To find the velocity after the collision I used the conservation of momentum equation above and calculated the "after impact) velocity to be -2/3 m/s. I then proceeded to find the acceleration and used Ax=-mew x g and got -2.94 m/s^2. From there I solved for time by plugging the velocity and acceleration into Vfx=Vix+Ax(delta T). I got the time for
the slide to be .22 seconds. I then plugged everything into the distance kinematics equation Xf=...and I got .075 m which I then converted to 7.55 cm, but it still says its wrong. Do you see any mistakes I made?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nightrider55 said:
To find the velocity after the collision I used the conservation of momentum equation above and calculated the "after impact) velocity to be -2/3 m/s. I then proceeded to find the acceleration and used Ax=-mew x g and got -2.94 m/s^2. From there I solved for time by plugging the velocity and acceleration into Vfx=Vix+Ax(delta T). I got the time for
the slide to be .22 seconds. I then plugged everything into the distance kinematics equation Xf=...and I got .075 m which I then converted to 7.55 cm, but it still says its wrong. Do you see any mistakes I made?

Is "it" that says the answer wrong a computer problem-system? If so, what units does it ask for the answer in? (Possibly #1 reason why the result of a correct method is rejected...) BTW, I agree with your solution (I used the "velocity-squared" equation,
(v_f)^2 = (v_i)^2 + 2a(delta_x), and found the same distance).
 
It wants it in cm. I don't get why it says I am wrong.
 
Not being there myself to see what the computer is doing, I can only be mystified. If you're sure you've used the right quantities for the problem, your method should give the correct answer.

It is conceivable that the computer system has a difficulty for this problem. The formula encoded for its calculation could be in error, or the tolerance for input answers might have been set to zero. (This happened once a ways back in a physics course here for one problem: good luck getting the computer's answer to sixteen decimal places...)

I would bring this up with the instructor and see if there is something set up wrong for that problem. It's not like that's never happened before. (Besides, I'm feeling cocky: I helped a student last week to get the instructor in a 5000-level stats course to re-examine their solution to an exam problem and find the error in the problem statement... ;-) )
 
Last edited:
I talked to my teacher about it and he came to the same answer when he did it. I did show answer on the website and they calculated 8.8 cm. I don't know how they got that :confused: He sent an e-mail to the website tech support to notify them of the error.

Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited:
I'm glad to hear the teacher agreed with us also! :) These difficulties do crop up from time to time with the computer-based systems; they aren't going to replace living instructors anytime soon...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K