For the transposition (i j)(k), this is what I have in my

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Artusartos
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of transpositions in permutations, specifically the notation (i j)(k). The key conclusions are that (i j)(k) results in k if k is neither i nor j, results in i if k is not equal to j, and results in j if k equals i. Participants clarify that the product of permutations remains a permutation, and the notation may have caused confusion regarding the application of transpositions to elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of permutation notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the concept of transpositions in group theory
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical functions and mappings
  • Experience with abstract algebra principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of permutation groups in abstract algebra
  • Learn about the cycle notation for permutations
  • Explore the concept of composition of functions in mathematics
  • Investigate the implications of transpositions on permutation parity
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra, educators teaching group theory, and anyone interested in the properties of permutations and transpositions.

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
For the transposition (i j)(k), this is what I have in my notes:

[itex](i j)(k) = k[/itex] if k is not equal to i or j
[itex](i j)(k) = i[/itex] if k is not equal to j
[itex](i j)(k) = j[/itex] if k = i

My question:

I thought the product of permuations is again a permutation, but here they are just equal to numbers. Can anybody explain why?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Maybe the brackets a bit confusing, and what you(r teacher) actually meant by (i j)(k) is the result of the transposition (i j) applied to the element k?

Also,
Artusartos said:
[itex](i j)(k) = i[/itex] if k is not equal to j

Are you sure you meant "not equal"?
 


CompuChip said:
Maybe the brackets a bit confusing, and what you(r teacher) actually meant by (i j)(k) is the result of the transposition (i j) applied to the element k?

Also,


Are you sure you meant "not equal"?

Maybe I copied that wrong. Thanks, I think I understand it now. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K