Force and acceleration on sodium atom if laser bundle shines on atom

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average force and acceleration on a sodium atom when exposed to a laser bundle with intensity greater than the saturation intensity (I >> Isat) for the 589 nm transition. The relevant equations involve the momentum of photons and the rate of excitation, with the force derived from the change in momentum per time. Key points include the significance of the residence time in the excited state and the effects of laser tuning on resonance fluorescence and stimulated emission. The final calculations yield a force of approximately -7 x 10^-20 N and an acceleration of about -1.8 x 10^6 m/s². The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the underlying physics, including momentum conservation and radiation pressure.
jennyjones
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I want to calculate the average force and acceleration on an sodium atom, if a laser bundle shines on it
which has I>>>> I(sat). I(sat) is the saturation intensity of the 589nm 3s-3p transition in sodium.
3p lives 16 ns



Homework Equations



c = 3 * 10 ^ 8
m sodium = 3.8 * 10^-26 kg
planck = 6.6* 10 ^-34 Js
tua = 16 ns



The Attempt at a Solution



F = - h(bar)/(2*λ*(tau)) ?

not sure which formula to use


thanx,

jenny
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not an area I know anything about, but the formula you quoted looks almost right to me.
The h/λ part gives you the momentum of each photon. 1/tau, where tau is the remanence time in the excited state, gives you the max rate of excitation. The reradiation is in a random direction, so you should only count the momentum of the absorbed photons. Force equals rate of change of momentum, so momentum per excitation multiplied by rate of excitation events.

What I don't understand is the constant factor of 1/4π. Maybe someone who knows this area will comment.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hello Jenny,

Could you reveal a bit more of the context of your post ?
I am intrigued by the I >> Isat. I take it the laser is tuned to the 589 nm, but the spectral width isn't indicated: is it sharper than the D-line or much broader?

When you irradiate Na atoms, you get resonance fluorescence (in all directions) and you also get stimulated emission (in the same direction as the incoming photon). When the intensity in increased, the latter shortens the residence time in the upper level (power broadening, page 90). Hope this link works, otherwise: Laser Spectroscopy: Vol. 1: Basic Principles
By Wolfgang Demtröder

I seem to recall that with a broadly tuned laser you get line broadening and with a very sharply tune laser you can get line splitting, but I'm not that sure - long time ago.

However, momentum conservation goes: Cohen-Tannoudji and Dalibard -- real experts in this field, the former a Nobel laureate -- mention a recoil of the atom of around 3 cm/s on p 16 . ( ##p = \hbar{\bf k} = h/\lambda##. No ##1/(4\pi)##. The ##1/\tau## comes in as the number of photons that can be absorbed per second, as Haruspex already wrote).

CT & D work out radiation pressure on p 17; more or less what you are asking.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
thanks so much for the help!

i think i know how to solve the problem now!

F = dp/dt = - h/λτ
F = - 6.6* 10 ^-34/(589 * 10^-9 * 16 * 10^-9) = -7 * 10^-20

a = F/m = -7 *10^-20/ 3.8 * 10^-26 kg = -1.8 *10^6
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top