Force extension graph displacememt to Kenetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the efficiency and predicted height of an arrow fired from a self-built acrylic bow. The user recorded various forces and the corresponding heights achieved by the arrow, attempting to convert the area under a force-extension graph into kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy (GPE). They reported an efficiency of 262% at 2N and 0.8% at 9N but expressed uncertainty about their height calculations. Another participant suggested using the work done by pulling the bow to determine potential energy directly, simplifying the height calculation to a formula involving force, distance, mass, and gravity. The user acknowledged this alternative approach and expressed gratitude for the insight.
Roberto2391
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to work out the efficiency for a self built acrylic bow, but I am having some problems working out a predicted height my arrow will reach. For the experiment i fired the arrow into the air and recorded the height it travelled, I have also recorded the weight of the arrow and the force applied to the sting when firing the arrow.

I then proceeded to do this for ten set forces 1N- 10N recording the results, after recording the results i worked out a way in which I could convert the area under a force extension graph into kinetic energy and then into GPE. Once I had the GPE I would divide the total by gravity and then by the mass of the arrow, giving me a predicted height.


To work out the height the arrow would travel, I measured the distance the arrow traveled for each of my forces; I then drew a force extension graph, using my method I worked out that 2N my bow was 262% efficient and for 9N my bow was 0.8% efficient.

A table of my results has been uploaded

I worked out the predicted height by using this chain of thought

Displacement under the graph = Kinetic Energy
Kinetic Energy = Gravitational potential energy
Gravitational potential energy / Mass and gravity

I don’t think I am working out the predicted height correctly but I can't think of another way to do it, all help welcome.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Please, please upload a PDF version of your doc. Many people here would not open a DOC file for fear of virus.
 
Defennder said:
Please, please upload a PDF version of your doc. Many people here would not open a DOC file for fear of virus.

I'm on my work comp so I'm not afraid. :cool:

Theres obviously something seriously wrong with your calculations. Since you haven't shown any of your calculations I don't know what that is. What function are you integrating to determine your kinetic energy? And BTW, you don't have to calculate the kinetic energy, if you know the work done by pulling the bow, then you can easily determine its ideal potential energy at its max height.

Work = Force of pull x distance of pull = Potential energy

In other words, your ideal (no losses) height will be:

height = \frac{Fd}{mg}
 
Defennder said:
Please, please upload a PDF version of your doc. Many people here would not open a DOC file for fear of virus.

I will remember that for the future.

Topher925 said:
Work = Force of pull x distance of pull = Potential energy

In other words, your ideal (no losses) height will be:

height = \frac{Fd}{mg}

And i had not though of working it out like that thank you very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top