Force in members of truss; section method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating forces in members of a truss using the section method and torque equations. Participants clarify the calculation of moments around different points, with suggestions to reassess assumptions about tension and compression. The consensus is that the book's answers are incorrect, with one member confirming their calculations of Ffh as 13 kN and Ffg as 3.3 kN, both in tension. The importance of only considering forces acting on the section during calculations is emphasized. Overall, the thread highlights common challenges in solving truss problems and the value of collaborative troubleshooting.
togo
Messages
106
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


295eq8w.jpg


Homework Equations


torque = force x distance

The Attempt at a Solution


35mihxs.jpg


words: hopefully this one is clearer than the last one and someone can follow what I did and figure out where I went wrong. Thanks.

Answer is Ffg=5kn T, Ffh = 20 kn T (only these two members are being questioned)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
About what point are you calculating the moments when solving for FH? Your scan is kind of fuzzy.

By the way, I don't get answers that match what you say they're supposed to be.

Also, you might get more responses if you post this type of problem in the engineering section.
 
I see. I calculated for the moment around E. (also double checked the answer in back of book and 5 and 20 are what it says)
 
Last edited:
You left out the moment due to GH.

Try calculating the moments about G instead of E.
 
that sounds like 2 equations with 2 unknowns, I'll work it
 
Me = -28.8 = 1.8FH - 2.4GH

= -16 = FH - 1.333GH

So two unknowns there in calculating for Me. For Mg:

Mg = -(1.8m)(Fh) + (2.4m)(10kN)
= -1.8FH + 24
FH = 13

of course not knowing whether to assume tension or compression, in any case the Mg I calculated is obviously wrong
 
togo said:
Mg = -(1.8m)(Fh) + (2.4m)(10kN)
= -1.8FH + 24
FH = 13

of course not knowing whether to assume tension or compression, in any case the Mg I calculated is obviously wrong
Why is it obviously wrong (other than you didn't specify the units)?
 
Ffh = 20kN (tension) according to the back of the book... (Ffh = Force FH)
 
This is a straightforward problem, so I'm certain the book is wrong. I'll see what the other helpers say.
 
  • #10
an additional question; when using section method you aren't supposed to take into account forces operating on the other side of the section except for the initial calculation of forces holding up the entire truss?
 
  • #11
Right. You start by looking at the structure as a whole to find the external reactions, but once you look at a section, you're only interested in the forces acting on that section.

Another helper got the same results I found. Your result of FFH=13 kN is correct, though the member is under tension, and you should find FFG=3.3 kN, also under tension. The book's answers are wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
I just wanted to say thanks I'm getting fairly good at these questions now.
 
Back
Top