Force=mass times acceleration, or time derivative of momentum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between the equations F=ma and F=dp/dt, highlighting their situational applicability. F=dp/dt is established as a more general definition of force, particularly relevant in scenarios involving variable mass systems, such as rockets. The conversation emphasizes that F=ma is only valid when mass is constant, and misunderstanding this can lead to confusion in relativistic contexts. The distinction between closed and open systems is crucial, especially regarding momentum flux and its implications for force calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of momentum and its mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of open versus closed systems in physics
  • Basic principles of relativity and their impact on classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the rocket equation in variable mass systems
  • Explore the concept of momentum flux and its relevance in open systems
  • Learn about the transition from classical mechanics to relativistic physics
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of F=dp/dt and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in advanced mechanics, particularly those exploring the nuances of force definitions in varying mass scenarios.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Which is more generally corrrect,

F=ma

or

F=dp/dt

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aren't they mathematically equivalent?
 
Some particles, such as photons, don't have mass but they still have a momentum. F=ma won't work in these cases.
 
Depends on the situation, are you dealing with an impulse, where you need to consider momentum transfer, or a longer duration event, where acceleration acts over a longer time duration. F=ma or F=dp/dt is situational.
 
Aren't they mathematically equivalent?

Not in general, if you consider the product rule.
 
F= ma is the same as F= dp/dt only if m is a constant. F= dp/dt is more general.
(In fact, one can consider "rate of change of momentum" to be the DEFINITION of force.)
 
Loren Booda said:
Which is more generally corrrect,

F=ma

or

F=dp/dt

?
Let = mv. Then

F = \frac{dp}{dt}

is a definition of F. F = ma is an equality between the quantities F, m and a when m is constant.

Incorrectly assuming that F = ma is a definition has gotten people really mixed up when going to relativity.

Pete
 
My question arises from the rocket problem, where the object expends mass.
 
Hi, Loren:
The crucial difference between the rocket+remaining fuel system and "normal" systems is that it is an "open" system (or geometric control volume) that loses momentum-carrying particles over time, whereas material systems (or material control volumes) keeps all momentum-carrying particles through all times.

To take a silly example:
Have a frictionless table of finite length, and let your system be that part of a book which happens to remain on top of the table, the book sliding along with some constant velocity V.
As the book gets to the edge, the momentum of your chosen system decreases because the parts of the book that travels beyond the table edge is not within your chosen system.
That is, material particles leave your observed system and carry their own momentum with themselves. This is called momentum flux.
But the correspomding decrease of momentum in your system cannot be related to any net force acting upon the material particles remaining in your system!

Thus, for open systems, we need to take care of the momentum flux term in order not to get wrong answers.

It is for this reason that the rocket equation looks somewhat differently than the version of Newton's 2.law for a MATERIAL system.
 
  • #10
pmb_phy said:
Let = mv. Then

F = \frac{dp}{dt}

is a definition of F. F = ma is an equality between the quantities F, m and a when m is constant.

Incorrectly assuming that F = ma is a definition has gotten people really mixed up when going to relativity.

Pete

Just a comment to this:
Pre-relativistically speaking, your fundamental laws for material systems were those of F=ma and mass conservation, and F=dp/dt was a derived law.
It is Einstein who deserves the credit for bringing about a more productive conceptual switch.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
818
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
917
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
690
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K