Force & Motion Homework: Force Diagrams, Velocities & Accelerations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving two boxes, where one box is placed on top of another, and the lower box is subjected to a horizontal force. Participants discuss the force diagrams, noting that the normal and gravitational forces are not Newton's third-law pairs. There is confusion regarding the friction forces acting on both boxes and how to calculate their velocities and accelerations. The need to clarify the direction of acceleration for each box is emphasized, as well as the importance of defining the friction forces correctly. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing the motion of the boxes as they interact under the influence of friction.
Nicholas Egebak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small box (mass m1) is placed upon a large box (mass m2); the large box i placed on a horizontal table. The boxes begin a rest on the table. The lower box is hit by a horizontal blow at the time t=0 resulting in a initial velocity v0. The frictioncoefficient between all surfaces are µk

Homework Equations


a) Draw force-diagrams for both boxes as the move relative to each other. Indicate all Newtons-Third-Law-Pairs.

b) Determine all velocities and accelerations of the boxes as the move relative to each other. At what time T do the boxes not move relative to each other anymore?

c) Determine the acceleration of the boxes when they do not move relative to each other. What length L do the boxes move in this fase? The initial velocity can be concidered know as v1

The Attempt at a Solution


I started drawing the force diagrams. No problem there. It was easy to see that the normal force in both cases were pairing up with the gravitational force.

For question b) I came up with this equation:
vbox1=v0-a*t​
Applied on the second box (the one underneath the other):

The acceleration must be the kinetic friction force divided by the mass:
vbox1=v0-(fk)/m*t​
Naturally I got:
vbox1=v0k*g*t​

For the box on top:
vbox2=-μk*g*t​

For the acceleration I differentiate both:

abox1=(vbox2)'=-g*µk
abox2=(vbox2)'=-g*µk

It is now that I am lost. I do not know how to find the time by which the boxes are not moving relatively to each other anymore...
Picture of scenario:
Udklip3.png

Force Diagrams:
Udklip2.png

Udklip.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nicholas Egebak said:
I started drawing the force diagrams. No problem there. It was easy to see that the normal force in both cases were pairing up with the gravitational force.
What are fk1 and fk2? The friction forces need more thought here.
Nicholas Egebak said:
Applied on the second box (the one underneath the other):
If you call it box 1, why do you say "second box"? Its acceleration is wrong because you are missing a force acting on it.

For the box on top, be careful with the sign. In which direction will it accelerate?
 
Nicholas Egebak said:
No problem there. It was easy to see that the normal force in both cases were pairing up with the gravitational force.
Careful: The normal force and the gravitational force are not 3rd-law pairs.
 
Doc Al said:
Careful: The normal force and the gravitational force are not 3rd-law pairs.
Oh, yeah! That's right! They are just equal and opposite...
mfb said:
What are fk1 and fk2? The friction forces need more thought here.If you call it box 1, why do you say "second box"? Its acceleration is wrong because you are missing a force acting on it.

For the box on top, be careful with the sign. In which direction will it accelerate?

Do you mean that box 2 has a velocity of 0 at t=0 and it therefore because of the friction will accelerate in the same direction as the velocity of box 1?

I understand that it is a bit confusing when referred to as both box 1 and 'second box' but they are the same

fk1 and fk2 should be the same - I realize that now
 
Nicholas Egebak said:
Do you mean that box 2 has a velocity of 0 at t=0 and it therefore because of the friction will accelerate in the same direction as the velocity of box 1?
For example, yes.

Nicholas Egebak said:
fk1 and fk2 should be the same - I realize that now
They are not, no matter what they represent (which is still undefined).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top