Force of gravity involving astrology

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational force between a newborn baby and Mars, as well as between the baby and an obstetrician. The gravitational force formula is correctly identified, but the user struggles with arithmetic errors leading to incorrect negative results. The importance of using the correct calculator functions for scientific notation is emphasized, with suggestions to simplify calculations by separating the exponent from the base. The conversation highlights the need for careful attention to detail in mathematical computations to avoid confusion. Ultimately, accurate calculations are essential for understanding gravitational interactions in physics.
problemswithp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


People who believe in astrology think the positions of the planets at the time of birth have a large effect on the personality and destiny of the baby. The only known interaction between a planet and the baby is the force of gravity.

Calculate the force of gravity (in Newtons) between a newborn baby (mass = 4.5 kg) and the planet Mars (mass = 6.4 X 1023 kg), when Mars is at its closest to the Earth (distance = 5.6 X 1010 m).


Calculate the force of gravity (in Newtons) between a newborn baby of mass 4.5 kg and the obstetrician of mass 100 kg, who is 0.5 m from the baby.


Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution


Fg= g ( 4.50 kg)(100.0 kg)/0.5m^2 =Fg= (6.67 E -11 N*m2/kg2)( 4.50 kg)(100.00 kg)/0.5m^2

I arrive at -1.32E4 but it gives me incorrect answer. I am completely lost with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get a negative result by multiplying positive numbers?

ehild
 
Welcome to PF,

problemswithp said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Fg= g ( 4.50 kg)(100.0 kg)/0.5m^2 =Fg= (6.67 E -11 N*m2/kg2)( 4.50 kg)(100.00 kg)/0.5m^2

I arrive at -1.32E4 but it gives me incorrect answer. I am completely lost with this problem.

Your method is fine. The physics of this problem is simple. Newton's law of gravitation tells you the gravitational force between any two masses given their separation. So, use that to compute the force. You're doing it right, in other words.

Since your physics is fine, the trouble must be with your math. If you got the wrong answer using the right equation, then you must have made an arithmetic error. I'm assuming that you just used a calculator, so short of punching in the wrong thing, I don't know what could have gone wrong. Maybe you could describe what you did to compute the answer...
 
I get a negative number by multiplying 6.67E-11 by the masses of the objects, I am not confortable with my calculator and I have probably gone wrong in the calculation, however I try repeatedly and any positive answers I get are incorrect...
 
problemswithp said:
I get a negative number by multiplying 6.67E-11 by the masses of the objects, I am not confortable with my calculator and I have probably gone wrong in the calculation, however I try repeatedly and any positive answers I get are incorrect...

Different calculators use different keys for the magnitudes (power of 10). In the calculator supplied for my Windows XP, it is the key "EXP". It can be also "EE". E-11 means 10-11. Calculate the value without 10-11 and then multiply the result with it.

ehild
 
problemswithp said:
I get a negative number by multiplying 6.67E-11 by the masses of the objects, I am not confortable with my calculator and I have probably gone wrong in the calculation, however I try repeatedly and any positive answers I get are incorrect...
As a check, you can do the calculation without the "e-11" or any other exponents. Then apply the exponents to the value you calculate, to get a final answer.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top