Force on a String: Understanding Constant Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force String
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of tension in a string under different conditions. In a horizontal string in equilibrium, tension remains constant throughout because there is no resultant force acting on any segment. Conversely, a vertically hanging string experiences varying tension due to the weight it supports, with tension increasing towards the top. The conversation highlights the distinction between static equilibrium and dynamic situations, such as a vibrating string, where tension is constant in magnitude but changes direction. Overall, the tension in a string is influenced by its orientation and mass distribution.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I just solved a problem where you considered a wave traveling on a string with varying density. I did it all correct but during the problem, I wondered why you can say that the tension in the string is the same everywhere on it. Why is that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the string is horizontal and you consider a small section of string it is in equilibrium. It is not accelerating and therefore there is no resultant force. This means the force to the right and the force to the left (ie the tension) on each sectionof string must be the same.
If the string is hanging vertically and the string has mass distributed along its length then the tension increases towards the top of the string. Imagine the string as a series of weights connected together. The top of the string has to support more weight than the bottom of the string.
 
If the string is horizontal and you consider a small section of string it is in equilibrium. It is not accelerating and therefore there is no resultant force.

Are you sure you mean this?

The mathematical derivation of the wave equation for a vibrating string relies on the differential element of string not being in equilibrium.

However the tension is (by definition for a string) always parallel to the direction of the string. It is the change of direction (rotation) of the element which occurs as the wave passes that gives rise to zero net acceration in the x direction but a real variable acceleration in the y direction. This is what causes the element to move up an down with time. Tension is a vector which has magnitude and direction. The magnitude does not change but the direction does.

go well
 
Yes Studiot...I was referring to a static string lying flat...not the string carrying a wave.
I should have made that clear, the extra point I wanted to add was that a hanging string will have differing tension along it if it has mass. In many (most) examples with weights on strings over pulleys etc it is assumed that the string has no mass.
You are quite correct.
Cheers
 
I understood the query to be about the tension in a string carrying a wave, ie a vibrating string.

But yes, certainly a simple string stretched by its own weight or other load is often a static equilibrium system. Catapault action for instance is not.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top