Why is T+f=Ma in Cylinder Roll Without Gliding?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 2K views
Exath
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
So I'm looking at a problem that involves a situation that looks like this
upload_2018-8-31_0-20-14.png

the cylinder rolls without gliding.
And there are these following equations that apply to it
(1) mg - T = ma (for the block hanging vertically)
(2) T + f = Ma (for the cylinder f = friction force, T = String force)
(3) Tr - fr = Ia (I = inertia, r = radius)

I'm only concerned about equation (2) where it's T + f = Ma, shouldn't it be T - f = Ma? Because the tension from the string and friction force are opposite to each other. It is apparently acknowledged that they are opposite in equation (3) where the torques are opposite, but why not in equation (2)?
 
Attachments
  • upload_2018-8-31_0-20-14.png
    upload_2018-8-31_0-20-14.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 1,030
Physics news on Phys.org
Exath said:
I'm only concerned about equation (2) where it's T + f = Ma, shouldn't it be T - f = Ma? Because the tension from the string and friction force are opposite to each other.
Careful! The tension and friction forced are not opposite. The friction opposes slipping between surfaces, thus it acts to the right to prevent slipping of the cylinder on the table.

Exath said:
It is apparently acknowledged that they are opposite in equation (3) where the torques are opposite, but why not in equation (2)?
Since one force is above the axis and the other below, their torques are opposite. But the forces themselves act in the same direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Exath
Doc Al said:
Since one force is above the axis and the other below, their torques are opposite. But the forces themselves act in the same direction.

Ah, that's what i was looking for, i was looking at the forces the same way i was looking at torques, that's obviously wrong lol
 
Incidentally in (3) you need angular acceleration not linear acceleration.