Force on Magnetized Fluid: Intuitive Explanation

[da_willem]

The force on a single dipole (dipole moment m) can be obtained by taking the gradient of its energy, i.e.

\vec{F} = \nabla (\vec{m} \cdot \vec{B})

One also often encounters for the energy of a magnetized material

-\mu_0 \vec{M}\cdot \vec{H}

And often the force on a material with magnetization M is written

\vec{F}=\mu_0 M \nabla H

why the replacement of B with H? Does it have something to do with the fact that part of B is producedby the magnetization (B=mu_0(H+M)) and the material can't exert a force on itself?? Or does one necessarily have to dive into the derivations to get an idea why?

Any intuitive thoughts?

 

[pam]

Do you have a source for your equations with H?
Probably the muzero H just stands for B outside the magnet.

 

[da_willem]

The force equation with H (M gradH) (Kelvin force) is the standard expression used in ferrohydrodynamics (see e.g. Rosensweig) when dealing with dilute colloids for example.

I'm wondering if the use of H instead of B results from the fact that only the external applied magnetic field should be used in evalueating the force because the magnetized material cannot exert a force on itself. Any familiarity with these expressions?