Force Required by Rockets and Angular Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
Engineers need to calculate the force required by four tangential rockets to spin a cylindrical satellite with a mass of 4800 kg and a radius of 2.7 m to 29 rpm in 6.0 minutes. The initial angular velocity is assumed to be 0 rad/s, leading to an angular acceleration of 0.00843 rad/s². The correct approach involves using torque and moment of inertia for a solid cylinder, resulting in a torque calculation of approximately 294.98 N·m. Dividing this torque by the radius gives a total force of about 109.25 N, which when divided by four rockets yields a force of approximately 27 N per rocket. After correcting the moment of inertia to reflect the satellite's shape, the final required force is about 14 N per rocket.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


To get a flat, uniform cylindrical satellite spinning at the correct rate, engineers fire four tangential rockets as shown in the figure. (Picture is attached).

If the satellite has a mass of 4800 kg and a radius of 2.7m , what is the required steady force of each rocket if the satellite is to reach 29 rpm in 6.0 min?

Homework Equations



F = ma
ω final - ω initial / t = α
F/4 = force required by each rocket

The Attempt at a Solution



I converted everything to radians, seconds, etc.

I assumed the initial angular velocity was 0 rad./s.
3.0368 rad./s / 360 s. = 0.00843 rad./s^2

The rockets are being fired tangentially so I then found tangential acceleration.
(2.7 m)(0.00843 rad./s^2) = 0.022761 m/s^2

Then I used F = ma

F = (4800 kg)(0.022761 m/s^2)
F = 109.2528 N

F/4 = 27 N
 

Attachments

  • TheFourRockets.jpg
    TheFourRockets.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 478
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing translational and rotational equations here. You must stick to rotation. Instead of F = ma, you must use the rotational analog.
 
I think I'm a tad bit closer now.

torque = moment of inertia*angular acceleration

torque = (4800 kg)*(2.7m)^2*(0.00843 rad./s^2)

torque = 294.98256 N * m

Since I want my units to contain only Newtons, shouldn't I divide by the radius?

294.98256 N * m / 2.7 m = 109.2528 N

109.2528 N / 4 = 27 N per rocket

which can't be correct because it's the same as I did before.
 
You're using the wrong moment of inertia; the spacecraft is a cylinder, not a cylindrical shell.
 
tms - Thank you. I obtained the correct answer of about 14 N per rocket.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top