Forced to use symmetry to solve this double integral?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 4K views
ainster31
Messages
158
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://i.imgur.com/d4ViHux.png

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The author writes: "Now, using symmetry, we have..."

But what symmetry does the author use? Also, I got the integral as shown in the remark but why is it wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ainster31 said:

Homework Statement



http://i.imgur.com/d4ViHux.png

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The author writes: "Now, using symmetry, we have..."

But what symmetry does the author use? Also, I got the integral as shown in the remark but why is it wrong?

The symmetry that's used is only to integrate over only one semi-circle in the xy-plane, and not the other. That's why θ only ranges from 0 to π/2, not all the way to π. That's also why there is a factor of 2 in front of the integral: because the integral over one semi-circle should be exactly equal to the integral over the other one. This is because the portion of the hemisphere is that is above one semi-circle is equal in volume to the portion that is above the other: one portion is just the reflection of the other one across the y-axis. That is the symmetry.
 
cepheid said:
The symmetry that's used is only to integrate over only one semi-circle in the xy-plane, and not the other. That's why θ only ranges from 0 to π/2, not all the way to π. That's also why there is a factor of 2 in front of the integral: because the integral over one semi-circle should be exactly equal to the integral over the other one. This is because the portion of the hemisphere is that is above one semi-circle is equal in volume to the portion that is above the other: one portion is just the reflection of the other one across the y-axis. That is the symmetry.


Alright, but why is the integral shown in the remark incorrect?