Foreshortening - mirror vs photo/video

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnJa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror
AI Thread Summary
Foreshortening appears differently when viewing oneself in a mirror compared to video or photographs. When looking in a mirror, the image is not foreshortened, as the reflection is at an equivalent distance, making the knees appear at the same height as they would be in reality. The angle from the eyes to the knees in the mirror is similar to that of observing an identical twin at double the distance. Therefore, the perception of knee height is consistent between the mirror and a real-life scenario. Ultimately, the mirror provides a true representation of one's size without distortion.
JohnJa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Is there more foreshortening when I look in the mirror than when I look at a video or photograph of myself.

For example, if I am naked, or with bare legs, and I walk towards a mirror, will my knees look lower to me than if I watch a video of myself walking towards the camera? (assuming the camera is at my eye level.)

And if so, which of these two perspectives more closely represents reality? / Represents what another person would see as I walk towards them?

Thank you.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I don't know anything about distortions introduced by video, but your image in a vertical plane mirror will not be foreshortened. If you are x feet from a plane mirror, your image (identical in size to the original you) will appear to be x feet on the other side of the mirror (that is, 2x feet away from you).
 
Thanks Doc Al,

I was thinking that if my image in the mirror is 2x feet away, but the angle from my eyes to the reflection of my knees would still be equivalent to the angle at x feet, then that might make my knees seem lower?

Or is the angle from my eyes to my knees in the mirror less steep than it would be if I was looking at my identical twin at x feet? Because my knees are effectively 2x feet away?
 
Looking at your image in the mirror (when you're x feet from the mirror) is exactly like looking at an identical twin standing 2x feet away.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top