Form and Features of Asteroids and Neutron Stars

• jingles2005
In summary, the forces that give asteroids their shapes are primarily determined by the random way their contents come together and the impacts they experience. Neutron stars that do not rotate around their axis are likely created by asymmetric supernova explosions and are initially born spinning quickly due to conservation of angular momentum. However, their fast spin rates can also be attributed to accretion torques from a nearby star. Non-rotating neutron stars are expected to be nearly perfect spheres.
jingles2005
What are the forces that give asteroids their shapes? And what shape do neutron stars that do not rotate around its axis have?

jingles2005 said:
What are the forces that give asteroids their shapes? And what shape do neutron stars that do not rotate around its axis have?

Let me try. Corrections welcome.

a. Fracture.
b. Sphere.

Neutron stars spin to conserve the energy released by the supernova explosion that preceeded them. They typically spin very fast. My argument [and I allow for the possibility I am wrong] is the explosion is assymetric and imparts a huge amount of angular momentum on the fragment.

Addendum: Listen to selfAdjoint before you even consider what I have to say. He is much more knowledgeable and I defer to his judgement. I just try to give my spin.

Last edited:
Chronos said:
Neutron stars spin to conserve the energy released by the supernova explosion that preceeded them. They typically spin very fast. My argument [and I allow for the possibility I am wrong] is the explosion is assymetric and imparts a huge amount of angular momentum on the fragment.

Neutron stars are indeed born spinning quickly, but I think the primary cause is conservation of angular momentum. That is, the radius shrinks by orders of magnitude, so small initial spin rates will be magnified:

$$I_1\omega_1=I_2\omega_2$$

$$\frac{2}{5}MR_1^2\omega_1=\frac{2}{5}MR_2^2\omega_2$$

$$\frac{\omega_2}{\omega_1}=\frac{R_1^2}{R_2^2}$$

This still isn't enough to get the fastest pulsars. These are actually created by accretion torques. This means that a nearby star is dumping matter onto the neutron star and spinning it up when the matter collides with the surface. That's how we get "millisecond pulsars".

You mentioned asymmetric supernova explosions; those are actually what we believe cause "neutron star kicks". We see neutron stars in the galaxy that are moving at unusually high velocities, implying that they were somehow "kicked" by something. Naturally, we think it has something to do with the supernova.

Finally, to the original question, a non-rotating neutron star should be very nearly a perfect sphere. In fact, it may be the best approximation to a perfect sphere that can be naturally created.

And about those asteroids...

The shapes of asteroids are fairly random. They are usually too small for gravity to play much of a role. Their shapes are determined by the random way their contents happen to come together, as well as what hits them in their travels.

OK, I'll bite, ST. Does not accretion from a binary partner tend to slow down the rotation of a neutron star. I'm thinking tidal forces. Humm, it just occurred to me it can also have a spin up effect... astrophysics can be so confusing sometimes...

Chronos said:
OK, I'll bite, ST. Does not accretion from a binary partner tend to slow down the rotation of a neutron star. I'm thinking tidal forces. Humm, it just occurred to me it can also have a spin up effect... astrophysics can be so confusing sometimes...

You're right that it can do both. The torque from the flow of accretion depends on the direction of the orbit. In other words, the infalling matter will hit the neutron star in the same sense as the companion is orbiting around it. If this opposes the spin, then it will be spun down by the torque. One would usually expect them to be spinning and orbiting in the same direction (for the same reason the planets tend to orbit and spin in the same direction), but it's not required. Even if it were spun down, it would eventually be spun up in the other direction as the torque continued.

The other effect that you're referring to (tidal locking), would be much smaller in this case, mainly because a neutron star is an extremely sturdy beast. The spin-down of the Earth arises because the moon distorts its shape a little bit and torques it as it spins. A neutron star's shape would be barely changed at all by its companion, both because of its small size and because of its resistance to compression. Instead, I'm talking about the direct impact of material with the surface of the neutron star.

Agreed, the accreting mass would be a trivial effect. I percieve a neutron star gaining a huge jolt of angular momentum from the massive ejection of material during a supernova event. While the EM disturbance would be spectacular in all directions, I would expect a polarized burst of neutrinos and gammas in the ejection plane.

Chronos said:
Agreed, the accreting mass would be a trivial effect.

Actually, I'm saying it wouldn't be. Tidal dissipation would be a trivial effect.

James R said:
And about those asteroids...

The shapes of asteroids are fairly random. They are usually too small for gravity to play much of a role. Their shapes are determined by the random way their contents happen to come together, as well as what hits them in their travels.

As you might suspect, the more massive the asteroid, the more significant gravity becomes in determining its shape. The largest asteroids are roughly spherical. The type of asteroid is also important. Some asteroids are self-gravitating gravel piles whereas others are more solid rock (which would have more odd shapes due to past collisions, etc.).

SpaceTiger said:
Actually, I'm saying it wouldn't be. Tidal dissipation would be a trivial effect.
Doh! I get it now. My denseness sometimes rivals a neutron star.

1. What is the difference between asteroids and neutron stars?

Asteroids are small, rocky objects that orbit the sun, while neutron stars are extremely dense celestial bodies that are the collapsed cores of massive stars.

2. How are asteroids and neutron stars formed?

Asteroids are believed to be remnants of the early solar system, while neutron stars are formed when a massive star dies in a supernova explosion and its core collapses.

3. How do we study the form and features of asteroids and neutron stars?

We can study asteroids using telescopes, spacecraft, and radar imaging. Neutron stars can be studied through observations of their radio emissions, X-rays, and gravitational waves.

4. What is the shape of an asteroid?

Most asteroids have irregular shapes, often resembling potatoes or rocks. However, some larger asteroids can have more spherical shapes.

5. Can we predict the trajectory of an asteroid or the behavior of a neutron star?

Yes, scientists use mathematical models and data from observations to predict the trajectory of asteroids and the behavior of neutron stars. However, these predictions are not always entirely accurate due to the complex nature of these objects.

• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
48
Views
2K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
182
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
18
Views
1K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
1K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
14
Views
2K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
402
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
• Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
2K