Formal Proof of ANOVA's F Distribution?

Boot20
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Does anyone know where I could find a formal proof that

\frac{\text{MS between}}{\text{MS within}}

has a F distribution under the null in ANOVA?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wikipedia states that the ratio of two chi-square random variables is F. If each MS term is normal then their sum will be Chi-squared.
 
In ANOVA each sum of squares can be pictured as a quadratic form, and under the null hypothesis the quadratic forms are either exactly chi-squared (if normality is assumed) or approximately chi-squared (under some general regularity conditions). The model assumptions and the null hypothesis ensure that the different quadratic forms are independent, so

(MS between)/(MS within)

is a ratio of independent chi-squares over their degrees of freedom which, by definition, gives an F distribution.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top