Formal proof of Thevenin theorem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around seeking a formal proof of Thevenin's theorem, specifically addressing why any linear network observed from a port is equivalent to a linear bipole. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings of this equivalence and the mathematical methods involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a formal proof of Thevenin's theorem and seeks clarification on the equivalence of linear networks to linear bipoles.
  • Another participant suggests searching for existing resources online, noting the abundance of materials available on the proof of Thevenin's theorem.
  • A different participant proposes that from a linear algebraic perspective, the complete composite network can be reduced to two parts through methods like Gauss elimination, leading to the Thevenin or Norton equivalent.
  • There are questions about the relevance of certain posts, indicating potential confusion or miscommunication among participants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the proof of Thevenin's theorem or the clarity of the arguments presented. There are competing views on the approach to proving the theorem and the relevance of certain contributions.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the linearity of networks and the methods of proof are not fully articulated, and the discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and clarity among participants.

cianfa72
Messages
2,964
Reaction score
311
TL;DR
Formal proof of Thevenin theorem from an algebraic point of view
Hi,
I am looking for a formal proof of Thevenin theorem. Actually the first point to clarify is why any linear network seen from a port is equivalent to a linear bipole.

In other words look at the following picture: each of the two parts are networks of bipoles themselves.
Thevenin.jpg

Why the part 1 -- as seen from the interconnection's port (topological cut) -- is equivalent to a linear bipole itself ?

Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you tried a google search? I did "proof of thevenin's theorem pdf" and got so much good stuff I honestly don't know which one to link to here. Many have references to other papers too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
DaveE said:
Have you tried a google search? I did "proof of thevenin's theorem pdf" and got so much good stuff I honestly don't know which one to link to here.
Yes, I believe the point is to show - from a linear algebraic point of view - that the linear system of the complete composite network actually breaks in two parts: by mean of elimination (e.g. Gauss elimination) we may always reduce each part to a linear equation (the Thevenin or Norton equivalent).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta Prime
@cianfa72 did you mean to post this in another thread? As it stands now, this makes no sense.
 
jim mcnamara said:
@cianfa72 did you mean to post this in another thread?
No, I mean whether or not you can confirm my argument about the structure of the linear system and how to break it in the two parts involved.
 
Thanks for the clarity.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K