What is the Expanded Formula for a Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expansion of the expression [(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)], which is claimed to be incorrectly expanded in a book. Participants clarify that the correct expansion should be based on the formula for a square, specifically (a+b)*(a+b) = a^2 + 2ab + b^2, where a = x3-x2 and b = x2-x1. It is noted that the original expression contains a sign error that leads to the confusion. The correct expansion confirms that the left-hand side does not equal the book's stated expansion. The discussion concludes with the acknowledgment of the mistake and the correct application of the square expansion formula.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)]
the book expands it to:
(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2

i didnt get it so can someone please help me in this, i think there is a mistake in the book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)]
the book expands it to:
(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)] does not equal to(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2

However,
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)] = (x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2
 


Originally posted by KL Kam
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3+x2)+(x2-x1)] does not equal to(x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2

However,
[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)]*[(x3-x2)+(x2-x1)] = (x3-x2)^2+2(x3-x2)*(x2-x1)+(x2-x1)^2
have you noticed the experssions on the right are the same?
 
Last edited:
Please read the expressions on the left hand sides carefully. I changed a "+" sign to a "-" sign in the third small bracket
 
yes you are right. i guess it was a type mistake )-:
 
With the negative, it is simply the formula for a square:

(a+b)*(a+b)= a2+ 2ab+ b2

with a= x3-x2 and b= x2- x1
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top