Formula for trajectory also applicable to decelerating bodies?

AI Thread Summary
The formula d=0.5(g)(t^2) is specific to free-falling objects under gravity and cannot be applied to decelerating bodies like cars without considering friction. For decelerating objects, alternative equations are available, such as d = v_i t + 0.5a t^2, which require knowledge of initial speed and acceleration. These formulas are valid only when acceleration is constant, unlike the gravitational formula which assumes a specific acceleration of 9.8 m/s². While deceleration can be conceptually compared to upward motion, the rates differ significantly. Therefore, appropriate formulas must be used for accurate calculations in deceleration scenarios.
ionowattodo
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The formula that is applied to falling objects with disregard to any exterior forces except gravity is : d=0.5(g)(t^2)

Can it also be applied to decelerating bodies, such as cars, with disregard to friction?
Such as a car with an initial velocity slowing down to 0 m/s over a distance of 50 meters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that formula only works for a body in free fall, starting from rest, in Earth's gravity (or equivalent).

For other accelerating or decelerating objects, there are various formulas you can use:
d = v_i t + \frac{1}{2}a t^2
if you know initial speed and acceleration
d = v_f t - \frac{1}{2}a t^2
if you know final speed and acceleration
d = \frac{(v_f + v_i)t}{2}
if you know initial and final speeds and time
d = \frac{v_f^2 - v_i^2}{2a}
if you know initial and final speed and acceleration

Of course, all these are only applicable when the acceleration is constant.
 
Can't you substitute gravity for deceleration?
Basically if you turn a deceleration car to it going upwards, it's the same as a thrown ball except with different deceleration rates
 
Well, yes, it's the same, but the rate of acceleration/deceleration is not g for a car. The formulas I gave in my post work for any constant acceleration/deceleration. But the one you were originally asking about is what you get when the acceleration happens to be equal to 9.8 m/s^2 (and the initial speed is zero).
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top