Four Equidistant Particles in electric fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves four charged particles arranged in a square configuration, with the goal of determining the net electric field at the center of the square. The charges are given specific values, and the edge length of the square is provided. The context is centered around electric fields and vector addition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to consider the electric fields as vectors rather than scalars, emphasizing the importance of direction in vector addition. There are attempts to clarify how to calculate the electric field from each charge and how to properly sum these vector quantities. Questions arise about the components of the vectors and the reasoning behind adding certain pairs of charges together.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to calculate the net electric field. Some guidance has been provided regarding the vector nature of electric fields and the necessity of adding them correctly. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in vector addition, particularly with regard to the arrangement of the charges.

Contextual Notes

Participants express confusion about the calculations and the principles behind vector addition, indicating a learning process that involves clarifying fundamental concepts of electric fields and forces. There is also mention of recent learning about vectors, which may affect participants' understanding of the problem.

C6ZR1
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In Fig.22-30, the four particles form a square of edge length a = 6.50 cm and have charges q1 = 7.59 nC, q2 = -10.9 nC, q3 = 11.5 nC, and q4 = -6.06 nC. What is the magnitude of the net electric field produced by the particles at the square's center?

http://edugen.wileyplus.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c22/fig22_32.gif


Homework Equations



E=kq/r^2



The Attempt at a Solution



First thing, I converted charges from nC to C as well as distances from cm into m

q1= 7.59 E-9 C
q2= -1.09 E-8 C
q3= 1.15 E-8 C
q4= -6.06 E-9 C

a=0.065m


after that, I formed triangles and used Pythagorean theorem to get distance for each particle to the center.

Center distance (hypotenuse) = 0.045962


So what I thought was find the Electric field produced by each particle with r= the hypotenuse and their sum would be the the net electric field

E1= (8.99 E 9)*(7.59 E -9)/ (0.045962)^2 = 32300.1

E2=(8.99 E 9)*(-1.09 E-8)/ (0.045962)^2 = -46386.2

E3= (8.99 E 9)*(1.15 E-8)/ (0.045962)^2 = 48939.5

E4= (8.99 E 9)*(-6.06 E-9)/ (0.045962)^2 = -25789

E net= 32300.1 + -46386.2 + 48939.5 + -25789 = 9064.45


I entered that in but my online homework is marking it as incorrect. Could someone please help. Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi C6ZR1! :smile:
C6ZR1 said:
So what I thought was find the Electric field produced by each particle with r= the hypotenuse and their sum would be the the net electric field

E1= (8.99 E 9)*(7.59 E -9)/ (0.045962)^2 = 32300.1

E2=(8.99 E 9)*(-1.09 E-8)/ (0.045962)^2 = -46386.2

E3= (8.99 E 9)*(1.15 E-8)/ (0.045962)^2 = 48939.5

E4= (8.99 E 9)*(-6.06 E-9)/ (0.045962)^2 = -25789

E net= 32300.1 + -46386.2 + 48939.5 + -25789 = 9064.45

nooo :redface:

fields are vectors, so you can't just add their magnitudes (scalar addition) …

you must add them as vectors :smile:
 
so then for each point would I use coordinates and subtract that from the center, C (0.0325,0.0325) and go about getting each particle in vector form?
 
i'm not sure what you mean by that

do it the easy way …

each vector points along a diagonal, so add the opposite pairs first, and that will give you two perpendicular vectors to add :wink:
 
but how do we know its components if we are only given the points? Sorry if I'm over looking it. I literally just learned about vectors/cross and dot products this week in school. :redface:
 
C6ZR1 said:
but how do we know its components if we are only given the points? Sorry if I'm over looking it. I literally just learned about vectors/cross and dot products this week in school. :redface:

technically, a vector isn't components, it's a line (with an arrow at the end of it)

so draw the lines (with arrows) …

each line will start at the centre, and point towards (or away from, if the force is repulsive) each of the four corners

(you could write out the components, but there's no point when the vectors themselves are so easy to draw)
 
ok, assuming its a positively charged point charge in the center then the arrows are are pointing towards, the center from Q1, and Q3. and towards Q3 and Q4
 
(you meant …)
C6ZR1 said:
ok, assuming its a positively charged point charge in the center then the arrows are are pointing towards, the center from Q1, and Q3. and towards Q2 and Q4

yes :smile:

and now add each pair :wink:
 
so adding
q1 and q3: 1.909E-8 C
q2+q4: -1.696 E-8

but I'm still having a little trouble trying to understand why we do this. Is it because those pairs are on a same line?
 
  • #10
C6ZR1 said:
so adding
q1 and q3: 1.909E-8 C
q2+q4: -1.696 E-8

sorry, where do those figures come from? :confused:
but I'm still having a little trouble trying to understand why we do this. Is it because those pairs are on a same line?

yes, it's easy to add vectors that are in the same line
 
  • #11
They were the charges of each particle in C. I don't think I'm understanding this too well. :/ What would I add?
 
  • #12
ohhh

you should be adding the vectors (the fields)
 
  • #13
Vector fields = Electric field produced by each particle?
 
  • #14
(just got up :zzz: …)

yes :smile:
 
  • #15
lol, well good morning.

So if the vector fields are electric fields produced by each particle then was my original attempt correct my finding the electric fields and adding them up?
 
  • #16
you didn't add the fields, you only added (or subtracted) their magnitudes :redface:
 
  • #17
ohhh, but isn't electric field E=(kq)/r^2?
 
  • #18
no, its (kq)/r2 radially away from the source

it's a vector!


potential is a scalar, field is a vector
 
  • #19
so is K the positive test charge in the center of the field?
 
  • #20
C6ZR1 said:
so is K the positive test charge in the center of the field?

you mean the k in kq/r2?

no, that's just a constant
 
  • #21
omg, not k, I meant q. I have no idea why I typed k. :redface:
 
  • #22
C6ZR1 said:
omg, not k, I meant q. I have no idea why I typed k. :redface:

ohh!

no, the positive test charge is the Q in F = kqQ/r2

the field E is the force-per-charge (force-per-test-charge, if you prefer),

so we divide F by Q to get E = force/charge = F/Q = kq/r2 :smile:
 
  • #23
that makes sense, but if we have a constant Q in this case, the positive test charge, as well as equidistant particles from that test charge then wouldn't E be the same for each particle? ie. E1= 8.99E9*1.602E-19/ (0.045962)^2

Im kinda confused on how they want use to find the magnitude of the net electro static force in this case
 
  • #24
C6ZR1 said:
that makes sense, but if we have a constant Q in this case, the positive test charge, as well as equidistant particles from that test charge then wouldn't E be the same for each particle?

not following you :confused:

the actual charges are all different
 
  • #25
ohh wait, is it F=kq1q2/r^2 where q1 is one of the particles and q2 is the fixed positive test charge?
 
  • #26
yup! :biggrin:
 
  • #27
ohhhhhhhhhh, then in that case would I Just find F for each particle then add them up to get the sum?
 
  • #28
C6ZR1 said:
ohhhhhhhhhh, then in that case would I Just find F for each particle then add them up to get the sum?

yes :smile:

provided you add them as vectors
 
  • #29
gotcha, I'll do this when I have break between classes. :smile:
 
  • #30
ok so I found that with the formula F=kq1q2/r^2 in the diagonal direction where the charges are being repulsed that F= 6.50731 E-15 and diagonal direction where charge are drawn inward F=-37.1554, if my calculations are correct, would I just take the dot product and multiply them together to get the magnitude?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K