Four Terminal Sensing Measurement for Printed Conducting Inks

  • Thread starter Thread starter guusmatijs
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on measuring the conductivity of printed conducting inks using a four terminal sensing measurement technique. The user intends to create four aluminum strips with equal distances of 10 mm center-to-center for this purpose. The inquiry revolves around whether to apply Ohm's law (R=U/I) directly or to incorporate a correction factor as suggested in the Haldor reference. Additionally, concerns regarding the probe contact area and the resistance of the aluminum probes are raised, with a suggestion to consider using a stand-alone four point probe for more accurate measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four terminal sensing measurement techniques
  • Familiarity with Ohm's law and its applications
  • Knowledge of deposition techniques for aluminum strips
  • Basic principles of conductivity measurement in printed electronics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the use of stand-alone four point probes for conductivity measurements
  • Study the impact of probe contact area on measurement accuracy
  • Examine the correction factors for resistance in printed conducting inks
  • Review Mott and Davis' "Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials" for foundational concepts
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in the field of printed electronics, materials scientists, and anyone involved in the measurement of conductivity in conducting inks.

guusmatijs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently working on printing conducting inks. After printing and sintering the inks my goal is to measure conductivity of my printed patterns. Therefore I want to create 4 strips of aluminium using deposition on my substrates before I print my ink.
I want to use these strips to perform a four terminal sensing measurement on the conductivity of my printed ink strips. In most documentation I find that the distance between points 1-2 and 3-4 in the image below is smaller than the distance between points 2-3.
220px-Four-point.png


However the mask I created for depositing the aluminium on my substrates leaves four strips of aluminium with equal distances (see image below) 10 mm from center to center.
[PLAIN]http://image.bayimg.com/hapbaaach.jpg
the strips of aluminium left on the substrate will have a width of 1.5 mm.

The actual question is whether I can use R=U/I, simply ohms law, or whether I need to use a correction factor like discussed in Haldor (please refer to attachment), R=G * U/I.

The strips I will be printing across the aluminium strips will have a width of 100-1000[tex]\mu[/tex]m depending on my printing settings. the thickness of my print will be approx 10 times smaller.

I hope I cleared out my question, If you need anything else please let me know.

Thank you :)

Attachment: Haldor
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1073056/Handige%20eBooks/Haldor%20weerstandsbepaling.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PhysicsForums!

My expertise in 4 Point Probe Measurement technique is rather limited, however, I believe that you may have some problems with the fact that the probe contact area looks to be rather extensive. Depending on deposition technique and process conditions, you may also need to factor in the resistance of the aluminum probes themselves.

Given that these seem to be rather large samples, could you just use a stand-alone 4 point probe (with, say, 0.25 to 1 mm spacing) instead of embedding electrodes? It'd also reduce your per-sample cost (if that's at all a concern).

If you can get a copy, the reference I have in my notes from my Thin Films class is Mott and Davis' Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Materials (even if it's from 1979).
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K