Fourier Transform: Limit in Infinity of Exponential Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limit of the exponential function with an imaginary exponent in the context of Fourier transforms. Specifically, the limit as x approaches infinity of the function e^{(ik-a)x} is evaluated. The conclusion is that while e^{ikx} oscillates and remains bounded due to the properties of sine and cosine, the term e^{-ax} approaches zero, leading to the overall limit being zero. This property is essential for understanding Fourier transforms involving complex exponentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and exponential functions
  • Knowledge of limits and asymptotic behavior in calculus
  • Basic properties of sine and cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms in detail
  • Learn about the convergence of complex exponential functions
  • Explore the implications of the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma
  • Investigate the role of damping factors in Fourier analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, engineers, and students studying signal processing or any field that utilizes Fourier transforms and complex analysis.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
In calculating some basic Fourier transform I seem stumble on the proble that I don't know how to take the limit in infinity of an exponentialfunction with imaginary exponent. In the attached example it just seems to give zero but I don't know what asserts this property. I would have thought that it would yield something infinite since a cosine or sine does not go to zero at infinity. What is done to arrive at the attached result?
 

Attachments

  • fourier transform.png
    fourier transform.png
    5.6 KB · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
In calculating some basic Fourier transform I seem stumble on the proble that I don't know how to take the limit in infinity of an exponentialfunction with imaginary exponent. In the attached example it just seems to give zero but I don't know what asserts this property. I would have thought that it would yield something infinite since a cosine or sine does not go to zero at infinity. What is done to arrive at the attached result?

Think of ##e^{(ik-a)x}## as equal to ##e^{ikx} \cdot e^{-ax}##. On the right hand side while ##e^{ikx}## is not really defined for when x tends to infinity, it is still bounded (because sine and cosine are bounded) and the term ##e^{-ax}## does tend to 0. So that the product tends to 0 and you get ##\lim _{x \to \infty}e^{(ik-a)x} =0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K