Fourier transform of a lorentzian function

Click For Summary
The Fourier transform of a Lorentzian function results in a decaying oscillation, not another Lorentzian. In contrast, the Fourier transform of a Gaussian function remains a Gaussian. The discussion raises a question about whether the Fourier transform of the second derivative of a Lorentzian function also yields a second derivative of a Lorentzian. Participants suggest exploring theorems related to the Fourier transform of derivatives for further insights. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing the behavior of these functions in frequency space.
zak8000
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
hi

I know the Fourier transform of a lorentzian function is a lorentzian but i was wondering if the Fourier transform of the second derivation of a lorentzian function is also a second derivative of a lorentzian function

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Fourier transform of a Lorentzian isn't a Lorentzian (its a decaying oscillation)

The Fourier transform of a Gaussian is a Gaussian, which is I guess what you mean?

Do you know any theorems about the Fourier transform of a derivative to help answer your other question?
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...

Similar threads