Fourier Transform Properties: Deriving TF{∫f(x)dx} = -iF(k)/k + πF(0)δ(k)

xoureo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If F(k)=TF\{f(x)\},k\neq 0 where TF is the Fourier transform ,and

F(0)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(u)du\neq 0 ,

show that

TF\{\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du\}=-i \frac{F(k)}{k} +\pi F(0)\delta(k)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I attempt the following:

TF\{\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du\}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \{\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du\}e^{-ikx}dx

and , integration by parts, with

w=\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du

dw=f(x)dx

give

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\{\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du \frac{i}{k} e^{-ikx}\}|_{-\infty}^{\infty} -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \frac{i}{k}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)e^{-ikx}dx

The last term is

-\frac{i}{k}F(k)

What should i do with the first?. I do this, but it probably be bad:

\frac{i}{k} e^{-ikx}\}|_{-\infty}^{\infty}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-ikx}dx = 2\pi\delta(k)

and

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\left[\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}\int_{-\infty}^xf(z)dz-\lim_{x\rightarrow -\infty}\int_{-\infty}^xf(z)dz\right] = F(0)

Then,

<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^xf(z)dze^{-ikx}=-i\frac{F(k)}{k}+2\pi F(0)\delta(k)<br />

where is an extra 2.

I tried to do this problem using convolution, but again i can't achieve the desired result:

(f*g)(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(u)g(x-u)du

If g(x-u) is the Heaviside function, and with x-u&gt;0 , the convolution is

(f*g)(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(u)g(x-u)du=\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du

Then,

TF\{\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du\}=TF\{(f*g)(x)\}=\sqrt{2\pi}F(k)G(k)

But, the Fourier transform of the Heaviside function is:

TF\{g(x)\}=\frac{-i}{k\sqrt{2\pi}}+\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\delta(k)

Hence,


TF\{\int_{-\infty}^{x}f(u)du\}=\frac{-iF(k)}{k}+\pi F(k)\delta(k)


But, in the last term appears F(k) , and i want to get F(0). What is wrong??


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's nothing wrong with your convolution argument. Think what happens if you integrate a test function against F(k)*delta(k). You get the same thing as if you integrate it against F(0)*delta(k) if F is continuous.F(k)*delta(k) and F(0)*delta(k) are the same distribution.
 
Ok,i understand it now, thanks for the help :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top