Fourier transform question, keep getting zero, minus infinity limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the Fourier transform of the function g(x), defined as g(x) = 0 for x < 0 and g(x) = e^{-x} for x ≥ 0. The Fourier transform is expressed as \(\tilde{g}(p) \propto \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-ipx} e^{-x} dx\), which simplifies to \(\tilde{g}(p) \propto \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-x(ip+1)} dx\). The confusion arises from the limits of the exponential function, particularly the interpretation of \(e^{-\infty}\) and its implications for the transform's value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Familiarity with complex exponentials and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of limits and behavior of exponential functions
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Fourier transforms, particularly for piecewise functions
  • Learn about convergence criteria for integrals involving complex exponentials
  • Explore the implications of limits in exponential functions, especially \(e^{-\infty}\)
  • Practice solving Fourier transforms of similar functions using integration by parts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are working with Fourier transforms and need to clarify the behavior of exponential functions in their calculations.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
calculate the Fourier transform of the function g(x) if g(x) = 0 for x<0 and g(x) = ##e^{-x}## otherwise.

putting g(x) into the transform we have:

##\tilde{g}(p) \propto \int_{0}^{inf} e^{-ipx} e^{-x} dx##

which we can write:

##\tilde{g}(p) \propto \int_{0}^{inf} e^{-x(ip+1)} dx##

which will give:

##\tilde{g}(p) \propto e^{-x(ip+1)} ## for x between 0 and infinity

the problem is ##e^{0} = 1## and ##e^{-inf} = 1## so i get zero.

is there a way around this?

thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
calculate the Fourier transform of the function g(x) if g(x) = 0 for x<0 and g(x) = ##e^{-x}## otherwise.

putting g(x) into the transform we have:

##\tilde{g}(p) \propto \int_{0}^{inf} e^{-ipx} e^{-x} dx##

which we can write:

##\tilde{g}(p) \propto \int_{0}^{inf} e^{-x(ip+1)} dx##

which will give:

##\tilde{g}(p) \propto e^{-x(ip+1)} ## for x between 0 and infinity

the problem is ##e^{0} = 1## and ##e^{-inf} = 1## so i get zero.

is there a way around this?

thanks for any help.

Is ##e^{-∞} = 1##? That would mean ##1/e^{∞} = 1##, which implies ##e^{∞} = 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
SteamKing said:
Is ##e^{-∞} = 1##? That would mean ##1/e^{∞} = 1##, which implies ##e^{∞} = 1##.

oh dear, so easy, and it took me ages to do all the latex on that op.

Thanks for clearing this up it's appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K