Fourier transforms, convolution, and Fraunhofer diffraction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the relationship between Fourier transforms (FT), convolution, and Fraunhofer diffraction in optics. It highlights that the Fourier transform of a circular aperture results in a first-order Bessel function, while the FT of a rectangular aperture yields a sinc function. The conversation emphasizes the process of calculating Fraunhofer diffraction by multiplying the Fourier transforms of different apertures and applying the 2-D Fourier Transform by performing FTs along both rows and columns. A link to relevant equations is provided for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with convolution in mathematical contexts
  • Basic knowledge of optics, specifically diffraction principles
  • Experience with numerical methods for calculating Fourier transforms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the Fourier transform of common shapes like circles and rectangles
  • Learn about the application of convolution in optical systems
  • Explore numerical methods for implementing the 2-D Fourier Transform
  • Investigate spatial filtering techniques in Fourier optics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on optics, signal processing, and mathematical methods in imaging.

marnobingo665
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been exposed to this notion in multiple classes (namely math and physics) but can't find any details about how one would actually calculate something using this principle: Diffraction in optics is closely related to Fourier transforms and finding the Fraunhofer diffraction of an aperture composed of simple shapes is equivalent to finding the Fourier transform of the convolution of those shapes.

For example a professor told us that the FT of a circle is a 1st order Bessel function and that the FT of a rectangle is a sinc function. She demonstrated finding the Fraunhofer diffraction of the following aperture: (please see first reply)

mzE1dQO

ZTD0neM


where white represents an opening and black represents and opaque region. She said it is equivalent to multiplying a circular aperture (f1) with a single opaque slit (f2) and that it would come out to be a thick band with a black dot (missing light) in the middle and thinner bands on both sides. But she never worked through how she used FTs to achieve that result: Where in this problem do you apply the concept of convolution, and what does it even mean to "take the FT of a rectangle"? How would I do this numerically instead of just sketching out intuitively what it looks like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Image attached, couldn't figure out how to upload in original post!
 

Attachments

  • QZVsS.png
    QZVsS.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 402
Yes, this is true. Some relevant keywords: Fourier optics, spatial filtering, spatial Fourier Transform. There is a close connection between optics and Fourier transforms.
The 2-D Fourier Transform just involves doing a FT in each direction. For a digital FT, I think all you're doing is a FT along each row, and then a FT along each column.

Here's a page with the relevant equations (look for the formulas with the double summations)
http://fourier.eng.hmc.edu/e101/lectures/Image_Processing/node6.html

Note that ##\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}\sum_{m=0}^{M-1} f_{mn} e^{-j 2\pi(\frac {mk} {M} + \frac {nl} {N})} ## = ##\sum_{n=0}^{N-1} e^{-j 2\pi \frac {nl} {N}} \sum_{m=0}^{M-1} f_{mn} e^{-j 2\pi \frac {mk} {M}} ## which I believe allows you to calculate it by rows and columns in the way I described.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K