Fourier transorm problem has me stumped

  • Thread starter Thread starter jasonc65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fourier
jasonc65
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
The ground state wave functional for the photon theory is given as

\Psi_0[\tilde{a}] = \eta \exp \left(-\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{(\vec{k}\times\tilde{a}(\vec{k}))\cdot(\vec{k}\times\tilde{a}(-\vec{k}))}{|\vec{k}|}\right)
(10.81)​

where \tilde{a} is given as the Fourier transform of a, that is,

a_i(\vec{x}) = \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}\tilde{a}_i(\vec{k})e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}
(10.67)​

Transforming back to a, the book now says that (10.81) is equivalent to

\Psi_0[a] = \eta \exp \left(-\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2} \int d^3x d^3y \frac{(\nabla\times\vec{a}(\vec{x}))\cdot(\nabla\times\vec{a}(\vec{y}))}{|\vec{x}-\vec{y}|^2}\right)
(10.83)​

I've had to think about this for a long time, and I'm still not sure I understand it exactly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Starting with 10.83,substituting a_i from 10.67, get to 10.81
 
Yes,usually the other way around is more simple.Passing from the coordinate representation to momentum representation.I think you struggled a great deal proving the first part of the equivalence.
Basically u really don't have to,usually in QFT,we like more the momentum representation,because we build the Feynman rules in the momentum representation.
So probably the author went backwards.He should have given it first in the coordinate representation and then pass it to momentum.After all,once u have it in the momentum representation,what's the point of passing it into the coordinate representation??

Daniel.

PS.I hope u see that the coordinate->momentum passing is immediate.
 
It takes at least three steps

I don't see it immediately.

-\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2} \int d^3x d^3y \frac{(\nabla\times\vec{a}(\vec{x}))\cdot(\nabla\times\vec{a}(\vec{y}))}{|\vec{x}-\vec{y}|^2}<br /> <br /> = -\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int\frac{d^3xd^3yd^3kd^3k&#039;}{(2\pi)^3(2\pi)^3}\frac{-(\vec{k}\times\tilde{a}(\vec{k})e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}})\cdot(\vec{k&#039;}\times\tilde{a}(\vec{k&#039;})e^{i\vec{k&#039;}\cdot\vec{y}})}{|\vec{x}-\vec{y}|^2}

= -\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{d^3xd^3y}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{-(\vec{k}\times\tilde{a}(\vec{k}))\cdot(\vec{k&#039;}\times\tilde{a}(\vec{k&#039;}))\delta^3(\vec{k}+\vec{k&#039;})}{|\vec{k}|}<br /> <br /> = -\frac{1}{2} \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{(\vec{k}\times\tilde{a}(\vec{k}))\cdot(\vec{ k}\times\tilde{a}(-\vec{k}))}{|\vec{k}|}

For the second step, one needs \int\frac{4\pi}{(2\pi)^3}d^3x\frac{e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{x}}}{|\vec{x}-\vec{y}|^2} = \frac{e^{i\vec{k}\cdot\vec{y}}}{|\vec{k}|}, which to me is not immediately obvious. It seems to have something to do with calculating the anti-Laplacian by reasoning in analogy with the inverse square law of gravitation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top