Fpt problem in quadratic residues

  • Thread starter Thread starter smslca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
smslca
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
In wikipedia source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_residue

under "composite modulus" section

I found the line
"On the other hand, if we want to know if there is a solution for x less than some given limit c, this problem is NP-complete;however, this is a fixed-parameter tractable problem, where c is the parameter."

what does it mean by "given limit c , and fixed parameter tractable with c as parameter". Does this mean regardless of large values are given for c as a limit , we can solve the quadratic congruence without knowing the factorization? or does it has any other meaning?
what is the limit of c such that we cannot solve quadratic congruence using fpt

If i am wrong or obscure in my question, please notify me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smslca said:
In wikipedia source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_residue

under "composite modulus" section

I found the line
"On the other hand, if we want to know if there is a solution for x less than some given limit c, this problem is NP-complete;however, this is a fixed-parameter tractable problem, where c is the parameter."

what does it mean by "given limit c , and fixed parameter tractable with c as parameter".
It simply means, that the problem is dependent of (a fixed parameter) ##c## and the module ##n##. This means there are basically two input parameters in which runtime can be expressed.
Does this mean regardless of large values are given for c as a limit , we can solve the quadratic congruence without knowing the factorization?
No. It means: We do not know, whether the quadratic residue problem (QRP) is NP-hard or not. But it is NP-hard if we introduce the parameter ##c## as the upper bound of a possible solution into the problem. This indicates that QRP is indeed NP-hard even though we have no formal proof.
... or does it has any other meaning?
what is the limit of c such that we cannot solve quadratic congruence using fpt

If i am wrong or obscure in my question, please notify me.
Factorization is only meant as a comparison here. And of course, if the module is factorized, then QRP can be solved in P.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top