Fractional exponents of negative

DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,830
Reaction score
7,815
I've been toying around with stuff I probably shouldn't be. :biggrin:

I've been sketching a graph of y=x^n where n is a rational number (as opposed to an integer).

Of course, when I get into the fractional exponents, the negative portion of the curve ends up being imaginary (eg. x=-2,n=2.5 then y = squareroot(-32) or about 5.6i ).

Before I actually attempt to sketch this on paper, has it been done already?


It'll be a 3D graph where the z-axis is the imaginary axis. The positive x side will look normal, the negative side will flip between positive y and negative y (also normal), but it will pass through the imaginary space with each flip.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean by flip between positive y and negative y, but in terms of graphing the imaginary component of the output, it sounds like a pretty good idea. Go for it.

You're going to run into some issues of uniqueness. When you graph \sqrt{x} we know to take the positive values because that's what we do. When you take \sqrt{-1} what is the positive value? It's kind of "obvious" in this case that it's i, not -i. But what about when you're graphing (-1)^{\frac{1}{8}}? You have

0.923879533 + 0.382683432i
0.382683432 + 0.923879533i

(and some other numbers) raised to the eight power give -1. Which one do you take?
 
Last edited:
Office_Shredder said:
I'm not sure what you mean by flip between positive y and negative y
When graphing it looking at only the integer n's, x^2 has its -ive component in positive y. x^3 has its -ive component in negative y. So somehere in there it flips. Having not seen the graph using fractional exponents, I don't really know what form the flip takes (except that it's smooth and imaginary).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top