Free Energy Thought Experiment Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a grain of salt and its interaction with a flimsy material above water. The initial calculations regarding the force exerted by the salt and the work needed to break the material are debated, with corrections pointing out inaccuracies in the force and work values. Participants clarify that the material must break before the salt interacts with the water, making entropy considerations irrelevant to the breaking process. The conclusion acknowledges the misunderstanding of the relationship between future events and past occurrences. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying physics concepts to hypothetical scenarios.
chem1234
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a thought experiment I don't understand.
Imagine there's a grain of salt that weighs 5 mg and it's 1mm above above a pool of water and it's on a very thing piece of flimsy material that takes about 1*10^-5 Newtons of force to break. Using Newton's 2nd law, I get the grain of salt is pushing downwards at a force of ~4*10^-5 Newtons. So it needs another 3*10^-5 Newtons to break the material. Since it is 1mm above the water, the work needed is 3*10^-8 Joules. ( Correct me if my math/formulas are wrong).
Using the ∆G= ∆H-T∆S. ∆H is 3*10^-8 let's say the temperature is 330 K. Assume that T∆S>3*10^-8. The entropy would be increased, I think, b/c the breaking of salt into Na and Cl- ions increases the possible microstates of the solution.

My question is, in the real world would the material break spontaneously? It seems counterintuitive. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your numbers make no sense to me. 5 mg would be pushing down with 5*10^-5 N, which is already 5 times as big as the force you said was needed to break the flimsy material.
The number you give for work needed makes no sense at all. You would need the elastic properties of the object to compute the work needed to break it.

The problems is that the flimsy object must break before any of the salt comes into contact with the water, so the entropy increase will play no role in breaking the material.
 
Ok Thanks. Yeah I meant 1*10^-4 for the force needed to break it. I don't know about elastic properties so I just invented a number.
But you answered my question. I guess events in the future can't affect the past.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top