Free particle propagator - Shankar POQM Eqn. 5.1.10, p. 153

Kostik
Messages
250
Reaction score
28
Can someone help with what must be a simple math issue that I'm stuck on. Shankar ("Principles of Quantum Mechanics" p. 153) evaluates the propagator for a free particle in Equation 5.1.10. A scan of the chapter is available here:

http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic1294975.files/Shankar%20-%20path%20integrals.pdf

The integral which precedes Eqn. 5.1.10 is not a traditional Gaussian of the form exp(-a(x+b)^2)
with Re(a)>0. Instead the integrand (after completing the square) is of the above form, but with Re(a)=0, i.e., a is a purely imaginary number. Therefore, the familiar closed form expression (which Shankar references in Appendix A.2) does not apply. The integrand oscillates and is not absolutely integrable; it may be integrable and expressible in elementary terms as shown in Eqn. 5.1.10, but that does not seem to follow from the traditional Gaussian integral of exp{-a(x+b)^2} with Re(a)>0.

To be more precise, completing the square explains the factor exp{ im(x - x')^2 / 2ћt } in Eqn 5.5.10. What remains is simply to evaluate (after a few changes of variable) the integral of exp(-iq^2)dq, a purely oscillatory function.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aha, OK I got it. Just need to make some variable changes, *but* eventually use the Fresnel integrals ##\int_0^∞ \text{cos}(x^2)dx = \int_0^∞ \text{sin}(x^2)dx = \sqrt{\pi/8}##. I think Shankar took a big liberty here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top