Frequency Equation: Help Finding an Equation Incorporating Tube Diameter

  • Thread starter Thread starter myshiee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
To find a frequency equation that incorporates tube diameter, the end correction is essential for standing waves in open or closed tubes. For tubes open at both ends, the frequency is calculated using the formula: frequency = velocity of wave / 2*L, while for tubes open at one end, it is frequency = velocity of wave / 4*L. The corrected length (L) includes the resonating length plus an end correction (e), which is 0.6 times the inner diameter for open tubes at both ends and 0.3 times for those open at one end. When dealing with tubes that have different diameters on each open side, adjustments to the end correction must be made to account for both diameters. Accurate calculations will yield the desired frequency based on the specific dimensions of the tube.
myshiee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys! i was wondering if anyone could help me find an equation to find frequency besides using the formula (velocity= frequency*wavelength).
My teacher said that we needed to find an equation that incorporated the use of the tube's diameter. I've been searching online but I can't find one that uses the diameter. Can anybody help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go for "end correction" for standing waves in open or closed tubes.
 
For resonance tube experiment:

frequency of tuning fork [n] = velocity of wave / 2*L for tube opened at both ends

frequency [n] = velocity of wave / 4*L for tube opened at one ends.

where L [corrected length] = Resonating length + e [end correction]

where e=0.3 * inner diameter of tube for tube opened at one end

and e=0.6* inner diameter for tube opened at both the ends.
 
Grazie!

Thanks for the help!:smile:
However, I forgot to say that for the open tube, there are two different diameters.Each open side has a different diameter. How would I include that in?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top