Frequency for Vibration Modes of a Square Membrane

AI Thread Summary
The frequency of vibration modes for a square membrane can be calculated using the equation ω m,n = ∏ [(m/a)^2 + (n/b)^2]^(1/2). For modes (2,1) and (1,2) on a square plate, these frequencies are equal, and their linear combinations also yield modes at the same frequency. In contrast, for a rectangular plate where a ≠ b, the frequencies differ, and combinations like (2,1)+(1,2) do not exist. The discussion clarifies that in a square plate, any linear combination of modes with the same frequency results in a mode that retains that frequency. Thus, the relationship between the modes and their frequencies is consistent in square membranes.
Johnny122
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So the equation to obtain the frequency of the modes of a square membrane is something like

ω m,n = ∏ [(m/a)^2 + (n/b)^2]^(1/2)

This equation can be used to get the frequency for Modes such as (2,1) and (1,2). How do I get the frequency for such modes as (2,1)+(1,2) and (2,1)-(1,2) ? Picture attached shows the modes.
 

Attachments

  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 712
Physics news on Phys.org
If it is a square plate, the frequencies for (2,1) and (1,2) are the same, and the others in your picture are linear combinations of them, also at the same frequency.

For a rectangular plate with ##a \ne b##, the (2,1) and (1,2) frequencies are different and the "(2,1)+(1,2) and (2,1)-(1,2) modes" don't exist.
 
Let's say that the frequency for (2,1) = x and (1,2) = y , so by linear combination, do you mean something like a x + b y = z where a and b are constants? And z would be the frequency for (2+1)+(1,2) or (2-1)-(1,2) ?
 
Johnny122 said:
Let's say that the frequency for (2,1) = x and (1,2) = y

It's a square plate, so a = b in your formula for the frequencies. So x = y.

In any structure that has two (or more) modes with the same frequency, and combination of the modes is also a "mode" with the same frequency.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top